Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-merge-prompt.t @ 17670:9dbd5fa6d301
filter: `updatebranchcache` during `addchangegroup` instead of after lock
The forced recomputation of the branch cache was introduced by `ee317dbfb9d0`.
Back there, `addchangegroup` did not handle any lock logic.
Later `ee1ed6afac21` introduced lock logic to `addchangegroup`. Its description
does not explain why the `updatebranchcache` call is made outside locking. I
believe that the lock was released there because it fit well with the transaction
release already in the code.
Finally `926a06f7a353` moved all "unlocked" code of `addchangegroup` to an
`repo._afterlock` callback.
I do not think that the call to `updatebranchcache()` requires to be done
outside locking. That may even be a bad idea to do so. Bringing this call back
in the `addchangegroup` function makes the flow simpler and eases the following
up changelog level filtering business.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:03:38 +0200 |
parents | 117f9190c1ba |
children | c8ba98bf0e71 |
line wrap: on
line source
Test for b5605d88dc27: Make ui.prompt repeat on "unrecognized response" again (issue897) 840e2b315c1f: Fix misleading error and prompts during update/merge (issue556) $ status() { > echo "--- status ---" > hg st -A file1 file2 > for file in file1 file2; do > if [ -f $file ]; then > echo "--- $file ---" > cat $file > else > echo "*** $file does not exist" > fi > done > } $ hg init $ echo 1 > file1 $ echo 2 > file2 $ hg ci -Am 'added file1 and file2' adding file1 adding file2 $ hg rm file1 $ echo changed >> file2 $ hg ci -m 'removed file1, changed file2' $ hg co 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo changed >> file1 $ hg rm file2 $ hg ci -m 'changed file1, removed file2' created new head Non-interactive merge: $ hg merge -y local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- M file2 C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed --- file2 --- 2 changed Interactive merge: $ hg co -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > c > d > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- file2: * (glob) C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed *** file2 does not exist Interactive merge with bad input: $ hg co -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > foo > bar > d > baz > c > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? unrecognized response local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? unrecognized response local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? unrecognized response remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- M file2 R file1 *** file1 does not exist --- file2 --- 2 changed Interactive merge with not enough input: $ hg co -C 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > d > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? abort: response expected [255] $ status --- status --- file2: * (glob) C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed *** file2 does not exist