view tests/test-bookmarks-strip.t @ 24545:9e0c67e84896

json: implement {tags} template

Tags is pretty easy to implement. Let's start there.

The output is slightly different from `hg tags -Tjson`. For reference,
the CLI has the following output:

  [
   {
    "node": "e2049974f9a23176c2addb61d8f5b86e0d620490",
    "rev": 29880,
    "tag": "tip",
    "type": ""
   },
   ...
  ]

Our output has the format:

  {
    "node": "0aeb19ea57a6d223bacddda3871cb78f24b06510",
    "tags": [
      {
        "node": "e2049974f9a23176c2addb61d8f5b86e0d620490",
        "tag": "tag1",
        "date": [1427775457.0, 25200]
      },
      ...
    ]
  }

"rev" is omitted because it isn't a reliable identifier. We shouldn't
be exposing them in web APIs and giving the impression it remotely
resembles a stable identifier. Perhaps we could one day hide this behind
a config option (it might be useful to expose when running servers
locally).

The "type" of the tag isn't defined because this information isn't yet
exposed to the hgweb templater (it could be in a follow-up) and because
it is questionable whether different types should be exposed at all.
(Should the web interface really be exposing "local" tags?)

We use an object for the outer type instead of Array for a few reasons.
First, it is extensible. If we ever need to throw more global properties
into the output, we can do that without breaking backwards compatibility
(property additions should be backwards compatible). Second, uniformity
in web APIs is nice. Having everything return objects seems much saner than
a mix of array and object. Third, there are security issues with arrays
in older browsers. The JSON web services world almost never uses arrays
as the main type for this reason.

Another possibly controversial part about this patch is how dates are
defined. While JSON has a Date type, it is based on the JavaScript Date
type, which is widely considered a pile of garbage. It is a non-starter
for this reason.

Many of Mercurial's built-in date filters drop seconds resolution. So
that's a non-starter as well, since we want the API to be lossless where
possible. rfc3339date, rfc822date, isodatesec, and date are all lossless.
However, they each require the client to perform string parsing on top of
JSON decoding. While date parsing libraries are pretty ubiquitous, some
languages don't have them out of the box. However, pretty much every
programming language can deal with UNIX timestamps (which are just
integers or floats). So, we choose to use Mercurial's internal date
representation, which in JSON is modeled as float seconds since UNIX
epoch and an integer timezone offset from UTC (keep in mind
JavaScript/JSON models all "Numbers" as double prevision floating point
numbers, so there isn't a difference between ints and floats in JSON).

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "mq=" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init

  $ echo qqq>qqq.txt

rollback dry run without rollback information

  $ hg rollback
  no rollback information available
  [1]

add file

  $ hg add
  adding qqq.txt

commit first revision

  $ hg ci -m 1

set bookmark

  $ hg book test

  $ echo www>>qqq.txt

commit second revision

  $ hg ci -m 2

set bookmark

  $ hg book test2

update to -2 (deactivates the active bookmark)

  $ hg update -r -2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (leaving bookmark test2)

  $ echo eee>>qqq.txt

commit new head

  $ hg ci -m 3
  created new head

bookmarks updated?

  $ hg book
     test                      1:25e1ee7a0081
     test2                     1:25e1ee7a0081

strip to revision 1

  $ hg strip 1
  saved backup bundle to $TESTTMP/.hg/strip-backup/*-backup.hg (glob)

list bookmarks

  $ hg book
     test                      0:5c9ad3787638
     test2                     0:5c9ad3787638

immediate rollback and reentrancy issue

  $ echo "mq=!" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Am adda
  adding a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -Am addb
  adding b
  $ hg bookmarks markb
  $ hg rollback
  repository tip rolled back to revision 0 (undo commit)
  working directory now based on revision 0

are you there?

  $ hg bookmarks
  no bookmarks set

can we commit? (issue2692)

  $ echo c > c
  $ hg ci -Am rockon
  adding c

can you be added again?

  $ hg bookmarks markb
  $ hg bookmarks
   * markb                     1:fdb34407462c

rollback dry run with rollback information

  $ hg rollback -n
  repository tip rolled back to revision 0 (undo commit)
  $ hg bookmarks
   * markb                     1:fdb34407462c

rollback dry run with rollback information and no commit undo

  $ rm .hg/store/undo
  $ hg rollback -n
  no rollback information available
  [1]
  $ hg bookmarks
   * markb                     1:fdb34407462c

  $ cd ..