Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-merge-commit.t @ 24545:9e0c67e84896
json: implement {tags} template
Tags is pretty easy to implement. Let's start there.
The output is slightly different from `hg tags -Tjson`. For reference,
the CLI has the following output:
[
{
"node": "e2049974f9a23176c2addb61d8f5b86e0d620490",
"rev": 29880,
"tag": "tip",
"type": ""
},
...
]
Our output has the format:
{
"node": "0aeb19ea57a6d223bacddda3871cb78f24b06510",
"tags": [
{
"node": "e2049974f9a23176c2addb61d8f5b86e0d620490",
"tag": "tag1",
"date": [1427775457.0, 25200]
},
...
]
}
"rev" is omitted because it isn't a reliable identifier. We shouldn't
be exposing them in web APIs and giving the impression it remotely
resembles a stable identifier. Perhaps we could one day hide this behind
a config option (it might be useful to expose when running servers
locally).
The "type" of the tag isn't defined because this information isn't yet
exposed to the hgweb templater (it could be in a follow-up) and because
it is questionable whether different types should be exposed at all.
(Should the web interface really be exposing "local" tags?)
We use an object for the outer type instead of Array for a few reasons.
First, it is extensible. If we ever need to throw more global properties
into the output, we can do that without breaking backwards compatibility
(property additions should be backwards compatible). Second, uniformity
in web APIs is nice. Having everything return objects seems much saner than
a mix of array and object. Third, there are security issues with arrays
in older browsers. The JSON web services world almost never uses arrays
as the main type for this reason.
Another possibly controversial part about this patch is how dates are
defined. While JSON has a Date type, it is based on the JavaScript Date
type, which is widely considered a pile of garbage. It is a non-starter
for this reason.
Many of Mercurial's built-in date filters drop seconds resolution. So
that's a non-starter as well, since we want the API to be lossless where
possible. rfc3339date, rfc822date, isodatesec, and date are all lossless.
However, they each require the client to perform string parsing on top of
JSON decoding. While date parsing libraries are pretty ubiquitous, some
languages don't have them out of the box. However, pretty much every
programming language can deal with UNIX timestamps (which are just
integers or floats). So, we choose to use Mercurial's internal date
representation, which in JSON is modeled as float seconds since UNIX
epoch and an integer timezone offset from UTC (keep in mind
JavaScript/JSON models all "Numbers" as double prevision floating point
numbers, so there isn't a difference between ints and floats in JSON).
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:52:21 -0700 |
parents | cb15835456cb |
children | bd625cd4e5e7 |
line wrap: on
line source
Check that renames are correctly saved by a commit after a merge Test with the merge on 3 having the rename on the local parent $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo line1 > foo $ hg add foo $ hg ci -m '0: add foo' $ echo line2 >> foo $ hg ci -m '1: change foo' $ hg up -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg mv foo bar $ rm bar $ echo line0 > bar $ echo line1 >> bar $ hg ci -m '2: mv foo bar; change bar' created new head $ hg merge 1 merging bar and foo to bar 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat bar line0 line1 line2 $ hg ci -m '3: merge with local rename' $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 77 ..... 2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 77 76 ..... 3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re) $ hg debugrename bar bar renamed from foo:9e25c27b87571a1edee5ae4dddee5687746cc8e2 $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 7 ..... 0 690b295714ae 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 7 13 ..... 1 9e25c27b8757 690b295714ae 000000000000 (re) Revert the content change from rev 2: $ hg up -C 2 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ rm bar $ echo line1 > bar $ hg ci -m '4: revert content change from rev 2' created new head $ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {parents}\n' 4:2263c1be0967 2:0f2ff26688b9 3:0555950ead28 2:0f2ff26688b9 1:5cd961e4045d 2:0f2ff26688b9 0:2665aaee66e9 1:5cd961e4045d 0:2665aaee66e9 This should use bar@rev2 as the ancestor: $ hg --debug merge 3 searching for copies back to rev 1 resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 0f2ff26688b9, local: 2263c1be0967+, remote: 0555950ead28 preserving bar for resolve of bar bar: versions differ -> m updating: bar 1/1 files (100.00%) picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False) merging bar my bar@2263c1be0967+ other bar@0555950ead28 ancestor bar@0f2ff26688b9 premerge successful 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat bar line1 line2 $ hg ci -m '5: merge' $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 77 ..... 2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 77 76 ..... 3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re) 2 153 7 ..... 4 ff4b45017382 d35118874825 000000000000 (re) 3 160 13 ..... 5 3701b4893544 ff4b45017382 5345f5ab8abd (re) Same thing, but with the merge on 3 having the rename on the remote parent: $ cd .. $ hg clone -U -r 1 -r 2 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) $ cd b $ hg up -C 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge 2 merging foo and bar to bar 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat bar line0 line1 line2 $ hg ci -m '3: merge with remote rename' $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 77 ..... 2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 77 76 ..... 3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re) $ hg debugrename bar bar renamed from foo:9e25c27b87571a1edee5ae4dddee5687746cc8e2 $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 7 ..... 0 690b295714ae 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 7 13 ..... 1 9e25c27b8757 690b295714ae 000000000000 (re) Revert the content change from rev 2: $ hg up -C 2 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ rm bar $ echo line1 > bar $ hg ci -m '4: revert content change from rev 2' created new head $ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {parents}\n' 4:2263c1be0967 2:0f2ff26688b9 3:3ffa6b9e35f0 1:5cd961e4045d 2:0f2ff26688b9 2:0f2ff26688b9 0:2665aaee66e9 1:5cd961e4045d 0:2665aaee66e9 This should use bar@rev2 as the ancestor: $ hg --debug merge 3 searching for copies back to rev 1 resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 0f2ff26688b9, local: 2263c1be0967+, remote: 3ffa6b9e35f0 preserving bar for resolve of bar bar: versions differ -> m updating: bar 1/1 files (100.00%) picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False) merging bar my bar@2263c1be0967+ other bar@3ffa6b9e35f0 ancestor bar@0f2ff26688b9 premerge successful 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat bar line1 line2 $ hg ci -m '5: merge' $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 77 ..... 2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 77 76 ..... 3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re) 2 153 7 ..... 4 ff4b45017382 d35118874825 000000000000 (re) 3 160 13 ..... 5 3701b4893544 ff4b45017382 5345f5ab8abd (re) $ cd ..