Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 17658:a02c1ffddae9 stable
largefiles: handle commit -A properly, after a --large commit (issue3542)
Previous to this, 'commit -A' would add as normal files, files that were already
committed as largefiles, resulting in files being listed twice by 'status -A'.
It also missed when (only) a largefile was deleted, even though status reported
it as '!'. This also has the side effect of properly reporting the state of the
affected largefiles in the post commit hook after a remove that also affected a
normal file (the largefiles used to be 'R', now are properly absent).
Since scmutil.addremove() is called both by the ui command (after some trivial
argument validation) and during the commit process when -A is specified, it
seems like a more appropriate method to wrap than the addremove command.
Currently, a repo is only enabled to use largefiles after an add that explicitly
identifies some file as large, and a subsequent commit. Therefore, this patch
only changes behavior after such a largefile enabling commit.
Note that in the test, if the final commit had a '-v', 'removing large8' would
be printed twice. Both of these originate in removelargefiles(). The first
print is in verbose mode after traversing remove + forget, the second is because
the '_isaddremove' attr is set and 'after' is not.
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:56:41 -0400 |
parents | f2719b387380 |
children | aa9385f983fa |
line wrap: on
line source
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for changesets, so first we have to recreate it o 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 $ mkrev() > { > revno=$1 > echo "rev $revno" > echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt > hg -q ci -m"rev $revno" > } setup test repo1 $ hg init repo1 $ cd repo1 $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt $ hg ci -Am"rev 0" adding foo.txt $ mkrev 1 rev 1 first branch $ mkrev 2 rev 2 $ mkrev 3 rev 3 back to rev 1 to create second branch $ hg up -r1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 4 rev 4 $ mkrev 5 rev 5 merge first branch to second branch $ hg up -C -r5 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch" one more commit following the merge $ mkrev 7 rev 7 back to "second branch" to make another head $ hg up -r5 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 8 rev 8 $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "graphlog=" >> $HGRCPATH the story so far $ hg glog --template "{rev}\n" @ 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2 comparing with ../repo2 searching for changes 4 5 6 7 8 test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it actually bundles 7 $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2 searching for changes 5 changesets found test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle 5 changesets found $ cd ..