Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-merge-default.t @ 17658:a02c1ffddae9 stable
largefiles: handle commit -A properly, after a --large commit (issue3542)
Previous to this, 'commit -A' would add as normal files, files that were already
committed as largefiles, resulting in files being listed twice by 'status -A'.
It also missed when (only) a largefile was deleted, even though status reported
it as '!'. This also has the side effect of properly reporting the state of the
affected largefiles in the post commit hook after a remove that also affected a
normal file (the largefiles used to be 'R', now are properly absent).
Since scmutil.addremove() is called both by the ui command (after some trivial
argument validation) and during the commit process when -A is specified, it
seems like a more appropriate method to wrap than the addremove command.
Currently, a repo is only enabled to use largefiles after an add that explicitly
identifies some file as large, and a subsequent commit. Therefore, this patch
only changes behavior after such a largefile enabling commit.
Note that in the test, if the final commit had a '-v', 'removing large8' would
be printed twice. Both of these originate in removelargefiles(). The first
print is in verbose mode after traversing remove + forget, the second is because
the '_isaddremove' attr is set and 'after' is not.
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:56:41 -0400 |
parents | fc8c7a5ccc4a |
children | 94f77624dbb5 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo a > a $ hg commit -A -ma adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -mb $ echo c >> a $ hg commit -mc $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo d >> a $ hg commit -md created new head $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo e >> a $ hg commit -me created new head $ hg up 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because not at a head: $ hg merge abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads .' to see heads) [255] $ hg up 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because > 2 heads: $ HGMERGE=internal:other; export HGMERGE $ hg merge abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads .' to see heads) [255] Should succeed: $ hg merge 2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg commit -mm1 Should succeed - 2 heads: $ hg merge -P changeset: 3:ea9ff125ff88 parent: 1:1846eede8b68 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: d $ hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg commit -mm2 Should fail because at tip: $ hg merge abort: nothing to merge [255] $ hg up 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Should fail because there is only one head: $ hg merge abort: nothing to merge (use 'hg update' instead) [255] $ hg up 3 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo f >> a $ hg branch foobranch marked working directory as branch foobranch (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?) $ hg commit -mf Should fail because merge with other branch: $ hg merge abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev (run 'hg heads' to see all heads) [255] Test for issue2043: ensure that 'merge -P' shows ancestors of 6 that are not ancestors of 7, regardless of where their least common ancestor is. Merge preview not affected by common ancestor: $ hg up -q 7 $ hg merge -q -P 6 2:2d95304fed5d 4:f25cbe84d8b3 5:a431fabd6039 6:e88e33f3bf62