view tests/test-pull-pull-corruption.t @ 17658:a02c1ffddae9 stable

largefiles: handle commit -A properly, after a --large commit (issue3542)

Previous to this, 'commit -A' would add as normal files, files that were already
committed as largefiles, resulting in files being listed twice by 'status -A'.
It also missed when (only) a largefile was deleted, even though status reported
it as '!'.  This also has the side effect of properly reporting the state of the
affected largefiles in the post commit hook after a remove that also affected a
normal file (the largefiles used to be 'R', now are properly absent).

Since scmutil.addremove() is called both by the ui command (after some trivial
argument validation) and during the commit process when -A is specified, it
seems like a more appropriate method to wrap than the addremove command.

Currently, a repo is only enabled to use largefiles after an add that explicitly
identifies some file as large, and a subsequent commit.  Therefore, this patch
only changes behavior after such a largefile enabling commit.

Note that in the test, if the final commit had a '-v', 'removing large8' would
be printed twice.  Both of these originate in removelargefiles().  The first
print is in verbose mode after traversing remove + forget, the second is because
the '_isaddremove' attr is set and 'after' is not.

Corrupt an hg repo with two pulls.
create one repo with a long history

  $ hg init source1
  $ cd source1
  $ touch foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do
  >     echo $i >> foo
  >     hg ci -m $i
  > done
  $ cd ..

create one repo with a shorter history

  $ hg clone -r 0 source1 source2
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd source2
  $ echo a >> foo
  $ hg ci -m a
  $ cd ..

create a third repo to pull both other repos into it

  $ hg init corrupted
  $ cd corrupted

use a hook to make the second pull start while the first one is still running

  $ echo '[hooks]' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo 'prechangegroup = sleep 5' >> .hg/hgrc

start a pull...

  $ hg pull ../source1 > pull.out 2>&1 &

... and start another pull before the first one has finished

  $ sleep 1
  $ hg pull ../source2 2>/dev/null
  pulling from ../source2
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ cat pull.out
  pulling from ../source1
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 10 changesets with 10 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

see the result

  $ wait
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 11 changesets, 11 total revisions

  $ cd ..