tests: use proctutil.stdout.write() instead of print() in test-extension.t
I was debugging this test failure on python3 + chg. I get the following hunk as
test failure:
```
@@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ Check normal command's load order of ext
4) bar uipopulate
5) foo reposetup
5) bar reposetup
+ 4) foo uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) bar uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) foo uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) bar uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) foo uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) bar uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) foo uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) bar uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) foo uipopulate (chg !)
+ 4) bar uipopulate (chg !)
+ 5) foo reposetup (chg !)
+ 5) bar reposetup (chg !)
0:
c24b9ac61126
```
After hours of debugging and head scracthing, I figured out that something is
wrong with output flushing. I initially switched the print() statements to
ui.warn() but thanks to Yuya who suggested using procutil.stdout.write()
instead.
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo This is file a1 > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m "commit #0"
$ echo This is file b1 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "commit #1"
$ rm b
$ hg update 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo This is file b2 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "commit #2"
created new head
$ cd ..; rm -r t
$ mkdir t
$ cd t
$ hg init
$ echo This is file a1 > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m "commit #0"
$ echo This is file b1 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "commit #1"
$ rm b
$ hg update 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo This is file b2 > b
$ hg commit -A -m "commit #2"
adding b
created new head
$ cd ..; rm -r t
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo This is file a1 > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m "commit #0"
$ echo This is file b1 > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m "commit #1"
$ rm b
$ hg remove b
$ hg update 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo This is file b2 > b
$ hg commit -A -m "commit #2"
adding b
created new head
$ hg merge 'wdir()'
abort: merging with the working copy has no effect
[255]
$ cd ..