view tests/test-casecollision-merge.t @ 23575:a2f139d25845

subrepo: drop the 'ui' parameter to archive()

The current state of subrepo methods is to pass a 'ui' object to some methods,
which has the effect of overriding the subrepo configuration since it is the
root repo's 'ui' that is passed along as deep as there are subrepos.  Other
subrepo method are *not* passed the root 'ui', and instead delegate to their
repo object's 'ui'.  Even in the former case where the root 'ui' is available,
some methods are inconsistent in their use of both the root 'ui' and the local
repo's 'ui'.  (Consider hg._incoming() uses the root 'ui' for path expansion
and some status messages, but also calls bundlerepo.getremotechanges(), which
eventually calls discovery.findcommonincoming(), which calls
setdiscovery.findcommonheads(), which calls status() on the local repo 'ui'.)

This inconsistency with respect to the configured output level is probably
always hidden, because --verbose, --debug and --quiet, along with their 'ui.xxx'
equivalents in the global and user level hgrc files are propagated from the
parent repo to the subrepo via 'baseui'.  The 'ui.xxx' settings in the parent
repo hgrc file are not propagated, but that seems like an unusual thing to set
on a per repo config file.  Any 'ui.xxx' options changed by --config are also
not propagated, because they are set on repo.ui by dispatch.py, not repo.baseui.

The goal here is to cleanup the subrepo methods by dropping the 'ui' parameter,
which in turn prevents mixing subtly different 'ui' instances on a given subrepo
level.  Some methods use more than just the output level settings in 'ui' (add
for example ends up calling scmutil.checkportabilityalert() with both the root
and local repo's 'ui' at different points).  This series just goes for the low
hanging fruit and switches methods that only use the output level.

If we really care about not letting a subrepo config override the root repo's
output level, we can propagate the verbose, debug and quiet settings to the
subrepo in the same way 'ui.commitsubrepos' is in hgsubrepo.__init__.

Archive only uses the 'ui' object to call its progress() method, and gitsubrepo
calls status().

#require icasefs

################################
test for branch merging
################################

test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:

(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file:
this is also case for issue3370.

  $ hg init branch_merge_renaming
  $ cd branch_merge_renaming

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg tag -l A
  $ hg rename a tmp
  $ hg rename tmp A
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ hg tag -l B
  $ hg update -q 0
  $ touch x
  $ hg add x
  $ hg commit -m '#2'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l C

  $ hg merge -q
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  R a
  C b
  C x

  $ hg update -q --clean 1
  $ hg merge -q
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C A
  C b
  $ hg commit -m '(D)'
  $ hg tag -l D

additional test for issue3452:

| this assumes the history below.
|
|  (A) -- (C) -- (E) -------
|      \      \             \
|       \      \             \
|         (B) -- (D) -- (F) -- (G)
|
|   A: add file 'a'
|   B: rename from 'a' to 'A'
|   C: add 'x' (or operation other than modification of 'a')
|   D: merge C into B
|   E: modify 'a'
|   F: modify 'A'
|   G: merge E into F
|
| issue3452 occurs when (B) is recorded before (C)

  $ hg update -q --clean C
  $ echo "modify 'a' at (E)" > a
  $ echo "modify 'b' at (E)" > b
  $ hg commit -m '(E)'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l E

  $ hg update -q --clean D
  $ echo "modify 'A' at (F)" > A
  $ hg commit -m '(F)'
  $ hg tag -l F

  $ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
  $ hg status -A
  M A
    a
  M b
  C x
  $ cat A
  modify 'a' at (E)

test also the case that (B) is recorded after (C), to prevent
regression by changes in the future.

to avoid unexpected (successful) behavior by filelog unification,
target file is not 'a'/'A' but 'b'/'B' in this case.

  $ hg update -q --clean A
  $ hg rename b tmp
  $ hg rename tmp B
  $ hg commit -m '(B1)'
  created new head
  $ hg tag -l B1

  $ hg merge -q C
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C B
  C a
  $ hg commit -m '(D1)'
  $ hg tag -l D1

  $ echo "modify 'B' at (F1)" > B
  $ hg commit -m '(F1)'
  $ hg tag -l F1

  $ hg merge -q --tool internal:other E
  $ hg status -A
  M B
    b
  M a
  C x
  $ cat B
  modify 'b' at (E)

  $ cd ..

(2) colliding file is not related to collided file

  $ hg init branch_merge_collding
  $ cd branch_merge_collding

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg remove a
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ echo A > A
  $ hg add A
  $ hg commit -m '#2'
  $ hg update --clean 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo x > x
  $ hg add x
  $ hg commit -m '#3'
  created new head
  $ echo 'modified at #4' > a
  $ hg commit -m '#4'

  $ hg merge
  abort: case-folding collision between a and A
  [255]
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  4
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  C x
  $ cat a
  modified at #4

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  abort: case-folding collision between a and A
  [255]
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  2
  $ hg status -A
  C A
  $ cat A
  A

test for deletion awareness of case-folding collision check (issue3648):
revision '#3' doesn't change 'a', so 'a' should be recognized as
safely removed in merging between #2 and #3.

  $ hg update --clean 3
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  R a
  C x

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg status -A
  M x
  C A

  $ cd ..


################################
test for linear updates
################################

test for rename awareness of case-folding collision check:

(1) colliding file is one renamed from collided file

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_1
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_1

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg rename a tmp
  $ hg rename tmp A
  $ hg commit -m '#1'

  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo 'this is added line' >> a
  $ hg update 1
  merging a and A to A
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg status -A
  M A
  $ cat A
  a
  this is added line

  $ cd ..

(2) colliding file is not related to collided file

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_2
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_2

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg remove a
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ echo A > A
  $ hg add A
  $ hg commit -m '#2'

  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  0
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  $ cat A
  a
  $ hg up -qC 2

  $ hg update --check 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  0
  $ hg status -A
  C a
  $ cat a
  a

  $ hg update --clean 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  2
  $ hg status -A
  C A
  $ cat A
  A

  $ cd ..

(3) colliding file is not related to collided file: added in working dir

  $ hg init linearupdate_renameaware_3
  $ cd linearupdate_renameaware_3

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ hg rename a b
  $ hg commit -m '#1'
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo B > B
  $ hg add B
  $ hg status
  A B
  $ hg update
  abort: case-folding collision between b and B
  [255]

  $ hg update --check
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]

  $ hg update --clean
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents --template '{rev}\n'
  1
  $ hg status -A
  C b
  $ cat b
  a

  $ cd ..