view tests/test-double-merge.t @ 23575:a2f139d25845

subrepo: drop the 'ui' parameter to archive()

The current state of subrepo methods is to pass a 'ui' object to some methods,
which has the effect of overriding the subrepo configuration since it is the
root repo's 'ui' that is passed along as deep as there are subrepos.  Other
subrepo method are *not* passed the root 'ui', and instead delegate to their
repo object's 'ui'.  Even in the former case where the root 'ui' is available,
some methods are inconsistent in their use of both the root 'ui' and the local
repo's 'ui'.  (Consider hg._incoming() uses the root 'ui' for path expansion
and some status messages, but also calls bundlerepo.getremotechanges(), which
eventually calls discovery.findcommonincoming(), which calls
setdiscovery.findcommonheads(), which calls status() on the local repo 'ui'.)

This inconsistency with respect to the configured output level is probably
always hidden, because --verbose, --debug and --quiet, along with their 'ui.xxx'
equivalents in the global and user level hgrc files are propagated from the
parent repo to the subrepo via 'baseui'.  The 'ui.xxx' settings in the parent
repo hgrc file are not propagated, but that seems like an unusual thing to set
on a per repo config file.  Any 'ui.xxx' options changed by --config are also
not propagated, because they are set on repo.ui by dispatch.py, not repo.baseui.

The goal here is to cleanup the subrepo methods by dropping the 'ui' parameter,
which in turn prevents mixing subtly different 'ui' instances on a given subrepo
level.  Some methods use more than just the output level settings in 'ui' (add
for example ends up calling scmutil.checkportabilityalert() with both the root
and local repo's 'ui' at different points).  This series just goes for the low
hanging fruit and switches methods that only use the output level.

If we really care about not letting a subrepo config override the root repo's
output level, we can propagate the verbose, debug and quiet settings to the
subrepo in the same way 'ui.commitsubrepos' is in hgsubrepo.__init__.

Archive only uses the 'ui' object to call its progress() method, and gitsubrepo
calls status().

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m
  updating: bar 1/2 files (50.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m
  updating: foo 2/2 files (100.00%)
  picked tool 'internal:merge' for foo (binary False symlink False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..