Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 30449:a31634336471
drawdag: update test repos by drawing the changelog DAG in ASCII
Currently, we have "debugbuilddag" which is a powerful tool to build test
cases but not intuitive. We may end up running "hg log" in the test to make
the test more readable.
This patch adds a "drawdag" extension with a "debugdrawdag" command for
similar testing purpose. Unlike the cryptic "debugbuilddag" command, it
reads an ASCII graph that is intuitive to human, so the test case can be
more readable.
Unlike "debugbuilddag", "drawdag" does not require an empty repo. So it can
be used to add new changesets to an existing repo.
Since the "drawdag" logic is not that trivial and only makes sense for
testing purpose, the extension is added to the "tests" directory, to make
the core logic clean. If we find it useful (for example, to demonstrate
cases and help user understand some cases) and want to ship it by default in
the future, we can move it to a ship-by-default "debugdrawdag" at that time.
author | Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:01:34 +0000 |
parents | 318a24b52eeb |
children | 841092fd6b85 |
line wrap: on
line source
Revert interactive tests 1 add and commit file f 2 add commit file folder1/g 3 add and commit file folder2/h 4 add and commit file folder1/i 5 commit change to file f 6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h 8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and 9 make workdir match 7 10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [ui] > interactive = true > [extensions] > record = > purge = > EOF $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2 $ cd a $ hg init >>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n") $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f" $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g" $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h" $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i" >>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying f" >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g" >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n") $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h" $ hg tip changeset: 6:59dd6e4ab63a tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: modifying folder2/h $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g (glob) removing folder1/i (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +a 1 2 3 4 5 revert change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 +b revert change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +c 1 2 3 4 5 revert change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 +d revert change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f Test that --interactive lift the need for --all $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2 reverting folder1/g (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q abort: user quit [255] $ ls folder1/ g Test that a noop revert doesn't do an unnecessary backup $ (echo y; echo n) | hg revert -i -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ 3 4 5 +d revert this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ ls folder1/ g Test --no-backup $ (echo y; echo y) | hg revert -i -C -r 2 folder1/g diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 1 hunks, 1 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ 3 4 5 +d revert this change to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y $ ls folder1/ g >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n") $ hg update -C 6 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF > y > y > y > y > y > n > n > EOF reverting f reverting folder1/g (glob) removing folder1/i (glob) reverting folder2/h (glob) diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +a 1 2 3 4 5 revert change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 +b revert change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +c 1 2 3 4 5 revert change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 +d revert change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n diff --git a/folder2/h b/folder2/h 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ cat f 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat folder1/g 1 2 3 4 5 d $ cat folder2/h e 1 2 3 4 5 f $ hg st M f M folder1/g R folder1/i $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF > y > y > n > n > EOF diff --git a/f b/f 2 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -a 1 2 3 4 5 discard change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@ 1 2 3 4 5 -b discard change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ hg st M f M folder1/g R folder1/i ? f.orig $ cat f a 1 2 3 4 5 $ cat f.orig 1 2 3 4 5 $ rm f.orig $ hg update -C . 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check editing files newly added by a revert 1) Create a dummy editor changing 1 to 42 $ cat > $TESTTMP/editor.sh << '__EOF__' > cat "$1" | sed "s/1/42/g" > tt > mv tt "$1" > __EOF__ 2) Add k $ printf "1\n" > k $ hg add k $ hg commit -m "add k" 3) Use interactive revert with editing (replacing +1 with +42): $ printf "0\n2\n" > k $ HGEDITOR="\"sh\" \"${TESTTMP}/editor.sh\"" hg revert -i <<EOF > y > e > EOF reverting k diff --git a/k b/k 1 hunks, 2 lines changed examine changes to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ -1 +0 +2 discard this change to 'k'? [Ynesfdaq?] e $ cat k 42 Check the experimental config to invert the selection: $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [experimental] > revertalternateinteractivemode=False > EOF $ hg up -C . 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ printf 'firstline\nc\n1\n2\n3\n 3\n5\nd\nlastline\n' > folder1/g $ hg diff --nodates diff -r a3d963a027aa folder1/g --- a/folder1/g +++ b/folder1/g @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ +firstline c 1 2 3 -4 + 3 5 d +lastline $ hg revert -i <<EOF > y > y > y > n > EOF reverting folder1/g (glob) diff --git a/folder1/g b/folder1/g 3 hunks, 3 lines changed examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ -firstline c 1 2 3 discard change 1/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -2,7 +1,7 @@ c 1 2 3 - 3 +4 5 d discard change 2/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y @@ -7,3 +6,2 @@ 5 d -lastline discard change 3/3 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n $ hg diff --nodates diff -r a3d963a027aa folder1/g --- a/folder1/g +++ b/folder1/g @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ 4 5 d +lastline $ hg update -C . 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg purge $ touch newfile $ hg add newfile $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > n > EOF forgetting newfile forget added file newfile (yn)? n $ hg status A newfile $ hg revert -i <<EOF > y > EOF forgetting newfile forget added file newfile (yn)? y $ hg status ? newfile