Mercurial > hg
view rust/hg-core/src/discovery.rs @ 46209:a51d345f1404
upgrade: move optimization addition to determineactions()
The documentation of `determineactions()` mention that it is given a list
returned from `findoptimizations()` however it was not true before this patch.
The code extending actions with optimizations also mentioned about it that this
should be in determineactions.
So let's do what comments at couple of places say.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9615
author | Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:06:24 +0530 |
parents | 26114bd6ec60 |
children | e98fd81bb151 |
line wrap: on
line source
// discovery.rs // // Copyright 2019 Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> // // This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the // GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version. //! Discovery operations //! //! This is a Rust counterpart to the `partialdiscovery` class of //! `mercurial.setdiscovery` use super::{Graph, GraphError, Revision, NULL_REVISION}; use crate::{ancestors::MissingAncestors, dagops, FastHashMap}; use rand::seq::SliceRandom; use rand::{thread_rng, RngCore, SeedableRng}; use std::cmp::{max, min}; use std::collections::{HashSet, VecDeque}; type Rng = rand_pcg::Pcg32; type Seed = [u8; 16]; pub struct PartialDiscovery<G: Graph + Clone> { target_heads: Option<Vec<Revision>>, graph: G, // plays the role of self._repo common: MissingAncestors<G>, undecided: Option<HashSet<Revision>>, children_cache: Option<FastHashMap<Revision, Vec<Revision>>>, missing: HashSet<Revision>, rng: Rng, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, } pub struct DiscoveryStats { pub undecided: Option<usize>, } /// Update an existing sample to match the expected size /// /// The sample is updated with revisions exponentially distant from each /// element of `heads`. /// /// If a target size is specified, the sampling will stop once this size is /// reached. Otherwise sampling will happen until roots of the <revs> set are /// reached. /// /// - `revs`: set of revs we want to discover (if None, `assume` the whole dag /// represented by `parentfn` /// - `heads`: set of DAG head revs /// - `sample`: a sample to update /// - `parentfn`: a callable to resolve parents for a revision /// - `quicksamplesize`: optional target size of the sample fn update_sample<I>( revs: Option<&HashSet<Revision>>, heads: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, sample: &mut HashSet<Revision>, parentsfn: impl Fn(Revision) -> Result<I, GraphError>, quicksamplesize: Option<usize>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> where I: Iterator<Item = Revision>, { let mut distances: FastHashMap<Revision, u32> = FastHashMap::default(); let mut visit: VecDeque<Revision> = heads.into_iter().collect(); let mut factor: u32 = 1; let mut seen: HashSet<Revision> = HashSet::new(); while let Some(current) = visit.pop_front() { if !seen.insert(current) { continue; } let d = *distances.entry(current).or_insert(1); if d > factor { factor *= 2; } if d == factor { sample.insert(current); if let Some(sz) = quicksamplesize { if sample.len() >= sz { return Ok(()); } } } for p in parentsfn(current)? { if let Some(revs) = revs { if !revs.contains(&p) { continue; } } distances.entry(p).or_insert(d + 1); visit.push_back(p); } } Ok(()) } struct ParentsIterator { parents: [Revision; 2], cur: usize, } impl ParentsIterator { fn graph_parents( graph: &impl Graph, r: Revision, ) -> Result<ParentsIterator, GraphError> { Ok(ParentsIterator { parents: graph.parents(r)?, cur: 0, }) } } impl Iterator for ParentsIterator { type Item = Revision; fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Revision> { if self.cur > 1 { return None; } let rev = self.parents[self.cur]; self.cur += 1; if rev == NULL_REVISION { return self.next(); } Some(rev) } } impl<G: Graph + Clone> PartialDiscovery<G> { /// Create a PartialDiscovery object, with the intent /// of comparing our `::<target_heads>` revset to the contents of another /// repo. /// /// For now `target_heads` is passed as a vector, and will be used /// at the first call to `ensure_undecided()`. /// /// If we want to make the signature more flexible, /// we'll have to make it a type argument of `PartialDiscovery` or a trait /// object since we'll keep it in the meanwhile /// /// The `respect_size` boolean controls how the sampling methods /// will interpret the size argument requested by the caller. If it's /// `false`, they are allowed to produce a sample whose size is more /// appropriate to the situation (typically bigger). /// /// The `randomize` boolean affects sampling, and specifically how /// limiting or last-minute expanding is been done: /// /// If `true`, both will perform random picking from `self.undecided`. /// This is currently the best for actual discoveries. /// /// If `false`, a reproductible picking strategy is performed. This is /// useful for integration tests. pub fn new( graph: G, target_heads: Vec<Revision>, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, ) -> Self { let mut seed = [0; 16]; if randomize { thread_rng().fill_bytes(&mut seed); } Self::new_with_seed(graph, target_heads, seed, respect_size, randomize) } pub fn new_with_seed( graph: G, target_heads: Vec<Revision>, seed: Seed, respect_size: bool, randomize: bool, ) -> Self { PartialDiscovery { undecided: None, children_cache: None, target_heads: Some(target_heads), graph: graph.clone(), common: MissingAncestors::new(graph, vec![]), missing: HashSet::new(), rng: Rng::from_seed(seed), respect_size, randomize, } } /// Extract at most `size` random elements from sample and return them /// as a vector fn limit_sample( &mut self, mut sample: Vec<Revision>, size: usize, ) -> Vec<Revision> { if !self.randomize { sample.sort(); sample.truncate(size); return sample; } let sample_len = sample.len(); if sample_len <= size { return sample; } let rng = &mut self.rng; let dropped_size = sample_len - size; let limited_slice = if size < dropped_size { sample.partial_shuffle(rng, size).0 } else { sample.partial_shuffle(rng, dropped_size).1 }; limited_slice.to_owned() } /// Register revisions known as being common pub fn add_common_revisions( &mut self, common: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> { let before_len = self.common.get_bases().len(); self.common.add_bases(common); if self.common.get_bases().len() == before_len { return Ok(()); } if let Some(ref mut undecided) = self.undecided { self.common.remove_ancestors_from(undecided)?; } Ok(()) } /// Register revisions known as being missing /// /// # Performance note /// /// Except in the most trivial case, the first call of this method has /// the side effect of computing `self.undecided` set for the first time, /// and the related caches it might need for efficiency of its internal /// computation. This is typically faster if more information is /// available in `self.common`. Therefore, for good performance, the /// caller should avoid calling this too early. pub fn add_missing_revisions( &mut self, missing: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, ) -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut tovisit: VecDeque<Revision> = missing.into_iter().collect(); if tovisit.is_empty() { return Ok(()); } self.ensure_children_cache()?; self.ensure_undecided()?; // for safety of possible future refactors let children = self.children_cache.as_ref().unwrap(); let mut seen: HashSet<Revision> = HashSet::new(); let undecided_mut = self.undecided.as_mut().unwrap(); while let Some(rev) = tovisit.pop_front() { if !self.missing.insert(rev) { // either it's known to be missing from a previous // invocation, and there's no need to iterate on its // children (we now they are all missing) // or it's from a previous iteration of this loop // and its children have already been queued continue; } undecided_mut.remove(&rev); match children.get(&rev) { None => { continue; } Some(this_children) => { for child in this_children.iter().cloned() { if seen.insert(child) { tovisit.push_back(child); } } } } } Ok(()) } /// Do we have any information about the peer? pub fn has_info(&self) -> bool { self.common.has_bases() } /// Did we acquire full knowledge of our Revisions that the peer has? pub fn is_complete(&self) -> bool { self.undecided.as_ref().map_or(false, HashSet::is_empty) } /// Return the heads of the currently known common set of revisions. /// /// If the discovery process is not complete (see `is_complete()`), the /// caller must be aware that this is an intermediate state. /// /// On the other hand, if it is complete, then this is currently /// the only way to retrieve the end results of the discovery process. /// /// We may introduce in the future an `into_common_heads` call that /// would be more appropriate for normal Rust callers, dropping `self` /// if it is complete. pub fn common_heads(&self) -> Result<HashSet<Revision>, GraphError> { self.common.bases_heads() } /// Force first computation of `self.undecided` /// /// After this, `self.undecided.as_ref()` and `.as_mut()` can be /// unwrapped to get workable immutable or mutable references without /// any panic. /// /// This is an imperative call instead of an access with added lazyness /// to reduce easily the scope of mutable borrow for the caller, /// compared to undecided(&'a mut self) -> &'a… that would keep it /// as long as the resulting immutable one. fn ensure_undecided(&mut self) -> Result<(), GraphError> { if self.undecided.is_some() { return Ok(()); } let tgt = self.target_heads.take().unwrap(); self.undecided = Some(self.common.missing_ancestors(tgt)?.into_iter().collect()); Ok(()) } fn ensure_children_cache(&mut self) -> Result<(), GraphError> { if self.children_cache.is_some() { return Ok(()); } self.ensure_undecided()?; let mut children: FastHashMap<Revision, Vec<Revision>> = FastHashMap::default(); for &rev in self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap() { for p in ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, rev)? { children.entry(p).or_insert_with(Vec::new).push(rev); } } self.children_cache = Some(children); Ok(()) } /// Provide statistics about the current state of the discovery process pub fn stats(&self) -> DiscoveryStats { DiscoveryStats { undecided: self.undecided.as_ref().map(HashSet::len), } } pub fn take_quick_sample( &mut self, headrevs: impl IntoIterator<Item = Revision>, size: usize, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { self.ensure_undecided()?; let mut sample = { let undecided = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); if undecided.len() <= size { return Ok(undecided.iter().cloned().collect()); } dagops::heads(&self.graph, undecided.iter())? }; if sample.len() >= size { return Ok(self.limit_sample(sample.into_iter().collect(), size)); } update_sample( None, headrevs, &mut sample, |r| ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, r), Some(size), )?; Ok(sample.into_iter().collect()) } /// Extract a sample from `self.undecided`, going from its heads and roots. /// /// The `size` parameter is used to avoid useless computations if /// it turns out to be bigger than the whole set of undecided Revisions. /// /// The sample is taken by using `update_sample` from the heads, then /// from the roots, working on the reverse DAG, /// expressed by `self.children_cache`. /// /// No effort is being made to complete or limit the sample to `size` /// but this method returns another interesting size that it derives /// from its knowledge of the structure of the various sets, leaving /// to the caller the decision to use it or not. fn bidirectional_sample( &mut self, size: usize, ) -> Result<(HashSet<Revision>, usize), GraphError> { self.ensure_undecided()?; { // we don't want to compute children_cache before this // but doing it after extracting self.undecided takes a mutable // ref to self while a shareable one is still active. let undecided = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); if undecided.len() <= size { return Ok((undecided.clone(), size)); } } self.ensure_children_cache()?; let revs = self.undecided.as_ref().unwrap(); let mut sample: HashSet<Revision> = revs.clone(); // it's possible that leveraging the children cache would be more // efficient here dagops::retain_heads(&self.graph, &mut sample)?; let revsheads = sample.clone(); // was again heads(revs) in python // update from heads update_sample( Some(revs), revsheads.iter().cloned(), &mut sample, |r| ParentsIterator::graph_parents(&self.graph, r), None, )?; // update from roots let revroots: HashSet<Revision> = dagops::roots(&self.graph, revs)?.into_iter().collect(); let prescribed_size = max(size, min(revroots.len(), revsheads.len())); let children = self.children_cache.as_ref().unwrap(); let empty_vec: Vec<Revision> = Vec::new(); update_sample( Some(revs), revroots, &mut sample, |r| Ok(children.get(&r).unwrap_or(&empty_vec).iter().cloned()), None, )?; Ok((sample, prescribed_size)) } /// Fill up sample up to the wished size with random undecided Revisions. /// /// This is intended to be used as a last resort completion if the /// regular sampling algorithm returns too few elements. fn random_complete_sample( &mut self, sample: &mut Vec<Revision>, size: usize, ) { let sample_len = sample.len(); if size <= sample_len { return; } let take_from: Vec<Revision> = self .undecided .as_ref() .unwrap() .iter() .filter(|&r| !sample.contains(r)) .cloned() .collect(); sample.extend(self.limit_sample(take_from, size - sample_len)); } pub fn take_full_sample( &mut self, size: usize, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { let (sample_set, prescribed_size) = self.bidirectional_sample(size)?; let size = if self.respect_size { size } else { prescribed_size }; let mut sample = self.limit_sample(sample_set.into_iter().collect(), size); self.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, size); Ok(sample) } } #[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; use crate::testing::SampleGraph; /// A PartialDiscovery as for pushing all the heads of `SampleGraph` /// /// To avoid actual randomness in these tests, we give it a fixed /// random seed, but by default we'll test the random version. fn full_disco() -> PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph> { PartialDiscovery::new_with_seed( SampleGraph, vec![10, 11, 12, 13], [0; 16], true, true, ) } /// A PartialDiscovery as for pushing the 12 head of `SampleGraph` /// /// To avoid actual randomness in tests, we give it a fixed random seed. fn disco12() -> PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph> { PartialDiscovery::new_with_seed( SampleGraph, vec![12], [0; 16], true, true, ) } fn sorted_undecided( disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>, ) -> Vec<Revision> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.undecided.as_ref().unwrap().iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); as_vec } fn sorted_missing(disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>) -> Vec<Revision> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.missing.iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); as_vec } fn sorted_common_heads( disco: &PartialDiscovery<SampleGraph>, ) -> Result<Vec<Revision>, GraphError> { let mut as_vec: Vec<Revision> = disco.common_heads()?.iter().cloned().collect(); as_vec.sort(); Ok(as_vec) } #[test] fn test_add_common_get_undecided() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); assert_eq!(disco.undecided, None); assert!(!disco.has_info()); assert_eq!(disco.stats().undecided, None); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![11, 12])?; assert!(disco.has_info()); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); assert!(disco.missing.is_empty()); // add_common_revisions did not trigger a premature computation // of `undecided`, let's check that and ask for them assert_eq!(disco.undecided, None); disco.ensure_undecided()?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5, 8, 10, 13]); assert_eq!(disco.stats().undecided, Some(4)); Ok(()) } /// in this test, we pretend that our peer misses exactly (8+10):: /// and we're comparing all our repo to it (as in a bare push) #[test] fn test_discovery() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![11, 12])?; disco.add_missing_revisions(vec![8, 10])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![8, 10, 13]); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![5])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![8, 10, 13]); assert!(disco.is_complete()); assert_eq!(sorted_common_heads(&disco)?, vec![5, 11, 12]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_add_missing_early_continue() -> Result<(), GraphError> { eprintln!("test_add_missing_early_stop"); let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.add_common_revisions(vec![13, 3, 4])?; disco.ensure_children_cache()?; // 12 is grand-child of 6 through 9 // passing them in this order maximizes the chances of the // early continue to do the wrong thing disco.add_missing_revisions(vec![6, 9, 12])?; assert_eq!(sorted_undecided(&disco), vec![5, 7, 10, 11]); assert_eq!(sorted_missing(&disco), vec![6, 9, 12]); assert!(!disco.is_complete()); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_no_need_to() { let sample = vec![1, 2, 3, 4]; assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample(sample, 10), vec![1, 2, 3, 4]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_less_than_half() { assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample((1..6).collect(), 2), vec![2, 5]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_more_than_half() { assert_eq!(full_disco().limit_sample((1..4).collect(), 2), vec![1, 2]); } #[test] fn test_limit_sample_no_random() { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.randomize = false; assert_eq!( disco.limit_sample(vec![1, 8, 13, 5, 7, 3], 4), vec![1, 3, 5, 7] ); } #[test] fn test_quick_sample_enough_undecided_heads() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.undecided = Some((1..=13).collect()); let mut sample_vec = disco.take_quick_sample(vec![], 4)?; sample_vec.sort(); assert_eq!(sample_vec, vec![10, 11, 12, 13]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_quick_sample_climbing_from_12() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = disco12(); disco.ensure_undecided()?; let mut sample_vec = disco.take_quick_sample(vec![12], 4)?; sample_vec.sort(); // r12's only parent is r9, whose unique grand-parent through the // diamond shape is r4. This ends there because the distance from r4 // to the root is only 3. assert_eq!(sample_vec, vec![4, 9, 12]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_children_cache() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.ensure_children_cache()?; let cache = disco.children_cache.unwrap(); assert_eq!(cache.get(&2).cloned(), Some(vec![4])); assert_eq!(cache.get(&10).cloned(), None); let mut children_4 = cache.get(&4).cloned().unwrap(); children_4.sort(); assert_eq!(children_4, vec![5, 6, 7]); let mut children_7 = cache.get(&7).cloned().unwrap(); children_7.sort(); assert_eq!(children_7, vec![9, 11]); Ok(()) } #[test] fn test_complete_sample() { let mut disco = full_disco(); let undecided: HashSet<Revision> = [4, 7, 9, 2, 3].iter().cloned().collect(); disco.undecided = Some(undecided); let mut sample = vec![0]; disco.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, 3); assert_eq!(sample.len(), 3); let mut sample = vec![2, 4, 7]; disco.random_complete_sample(&mut sample, 1); assert_eq!(sample.len(), 3); } #[test] fn test_bidirectional_sample() -> Result<(), GraphError> { let mut disco = full_disco(); disco.undecided = Some((0..=13).into_iter().collect()); let (sample_set, size) = disco.bidirectional_sample(7)?; assert_eq!(size, 7); let mut sample: Vec<Revision> = sample_set.into_iter().collect(); sample.sort(); // our DAG is a bit too small for the results to be really interesting // at least it shows that // - we went both ways // - we didn't take all Revisions (6 is not in the sample) assert_eq!(sample, vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]); Ok(()) } }