wireprotov2: move response handling out of httppeer
And fix some bugs while we're here.
The code for processing response data from the unified framing
protocol is mostly peer agnostic. The peer-specific bits are the
configuration of the client reactor and how I/O is performed. I
initially implemented things in httppeer for expediency.
This commit establishes a module for holding the peer API level
code for the framing based protocol. Inside this module we have
a class to help coordinate higher-level activities, such as managing
response object.
The client handler bits could be rolled into clientreactor. However,
I want clientreactor to be sans I/O and I want it to only be
concerned with protocol-level details, not higher-level concepts
like how protocol events are converted into peer API concepts. I
want clientreactor to receive a frame and then tell the caller what
should probably be done about it. If we start putting things like
future resolution into clientreactor, we'll constrain how the protocol
can be used (e.g. by requiring futures).
The new code is loosely based on what was in httppeer before. I
changed things a bit around response handling. We now buffer the
entire response "body" and then handle it as one atomic unit. This
fixed a bug around decoding CBOR data that spanned multiple frames.
I also fixed an off-by-one bug where we failed to read a single byte
CBOR value at the end of the stream. That's why tests have changed.
The new state of httppeer is much cleaner. It is largely agnostic
about framing protocol implementation details. That's how it should
be: the framing protocol is designed to be largely transport
agnostic. We want peers merely putting bytes on the wire and telling
the framing protocol where to read response data from.
There's still a bit of work to be done here, especially for
representing responses. But at least we're a step closer to having a
higher-level peer interface that can be plugged into the SSH peer
someday.
I initially added this class to wireprotoframing. However, we'll
eventually need version 2 specific functions to convert CBOR responses
into data structures expected by the code calling commands. This
needs to live somewhere. Since that code would be shared across peers,
we need a common module. We have wireprotov1peer for the equivalent
version 1 code. So I decided to establish wireprotov2peer.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3379
$ hgcommit() {
> hg commit -u user "$@"
> }
$ hg init clhead
$ cd clhead
$ touch foo && hg add && hgcommit -m 'foo'
adding foo
$ touch bar && hg add && hgcommit -m 'bar'
adding bar
$ touch baz && hg add && hgcommit -m 'baz'
adding baz
$ echo "flub" > foo
$ hgcommit -m "flub"
$ echo "nub" > foo
$ hgcommit -m "nub"
$ hg up -C 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo "c1" > c1
$ hg add c1
$ hgcommit -m "c1"
created new head
$ echo "c2" > c1
$ hgcommit -m "c2"
$ hg up -C 2
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo "d1" > d1
$ hg add d1
$ hgcommit -m "d1"
created new head
$ echo "d2" > d1
$ hgcommit -m "d2"
$ hg tag -l good
fail with three heads
$ hg up -C good
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge
abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads .' to see heads)
[255]
close one of the heads
$ hg up -C 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hgcommit -m 'close this head' --close-branch
succeed with two open heads
$ hg up -C good
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up -C good
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hgcommit -m 'merged heads'
hg update -C 8
$ hg update -C 8
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
hg branch some-branch
$ hg branch some-branch
marked working directory as branch some-branch
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
hg commit
$ hgcommit -m 'started some-branch'
hg commit --close-branch
$ hgcommit --close-branch -m 'closed some-branch'
hg update default
$ hg update default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
hg merge some-branch
$ hg merge some-branch
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
hg commit (no reopening of some-branch)
$ hgcommit -m 'merge with closed branch'
$ cd ..