view contrib/editmerge @ 40048:a732d70253b0

tests: don't be as verbose in wireprotov2 tests

I don't think that printing low-level I/O and frames is beneficial to
testing command-level functionality. Protocol-level testing, yes. But
command-level functionality shouldn't care about low-level details in
most cases. This output makes tests more verbose and harder to read.
It also makes them harder to maintain, as you need to glob over various
dynamic width fields.

Let's remove these low-level details from many of the wireprotov2
tests.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4861

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# A simple script for opening merge conflicts in the editor.
# Use the following Mercurial settings to enable it.
#
# [ui]
# merge = editmerge
#
# [merge-tools]
# editmerge.args=$output
# editmerge.check=changed
# editmerge.premerge=keep

FILE="$1"

getlines() {
  grep -n "^<<<<<<" "$FILE" | cut -f1 -d:
}

# editor preference loosely based on https://mercurial-scm.org/wiki/editor
# hg showconfig is at the bottom though, since it's slow to run (0.15 seconds)
ED="$HGEDITOR"
if [ "$ED" = "" ] ; then
  ED="$VISUAL"
fi
if [ "$ED" = "" ] ; then
  ED="$EDITOR"
fi
if [ "$ED" = "" ] ; then
  ED="$(hg showconfig ui.editor)"
fi
if [ "$ED" = "" ] ; then
  echo "merge failed - unable to find editor"
  exit 1
fi

if [ "$ED" = "emacs" ] || [ "$ED" = "nano" ] || [ "$ED" = "vim" ] ; then
  FIRSTLINE="$(getlines | head -n 1)"
  PREVIOUSLINE=""

  # open the editor to the first conflict until there are no more
  # or the user stops editing the file
  while [ ! "$FIRSTLINE" = "" ] && [ ! "$FIRSTLINE" = "$PREVIOUSLINE" ] ; do
    $ED "+$FIRSTLINE" "$FILE"
    PREVIOUSLINE="$FIRSTLINE"
    FIRSTLINE="$(getlines | head -n 1)"
  done
else
  $ED "$FILE"
fi

# get the line numbers of the remaining conflicts
CONFLICTS="$(getlines | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n/, /g')"
if [ ! "$CONFLICTS" = "" ] ; then
  echo "merge failed - resolve the conflicts (line $CONFLICTS) then use 'hg resolve --mark'"
  exit 1
fi

exit 0