view tests/test-check-commit.t @ 29774:a7f8939641aa

merge: use labels in prompts to the user Now that we persist the labels, we can consistently use the labels in prompts for the user without risk of confusion. This changes a huge amount of command output: This means that merge prompts like: no tool found to merge a keep (l)ocal, take (o)ther, or leave (u)nresolved? u and remote changed a which local deleted use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c become: no tool found to merge a keep (l)ocal [working copy], take (o)ther [destination], or leave (u)nresolved? u and remote [source] changed a which local [dest] deleted use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c where "working copy" and "destination" were supplied by the command that requested the merge as labels for conflict markers, and thus should be human-friendly.
author Simon Farnsworth <simonfar@fb.com>
date Fri, 12 Aug 2016 06:01:42 -0700
parents 3c9066ed557c
children 2cab496db1e0
line wrap: on
line source

#require test-repo

Enable obsolescence to avoid the warning issue when obsmarker are found

  $ . "$TESTDIR/helpers-testrepo.sh"

Go back in the hg repo

  $ cd $TESTDIR/..

  $ for node in `hg log --rev 'not public() and ::.' --template '{node|short}\n'`; do
  >    hg export $node | contrib/check-commit > ${TESTTMP}/check-commit.out
  >    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
  >        echo "Revision $node does not comply with rules"
  >        echo '------------------------------------------------------'
  >        cat ${TESTTMP}/check-commit.out
  >        echo
  >   fi
  > done