view tests/test-merge5.t @ 29774:a7f8939641aa

merge: use labels in prompts to the user

Now that we persist the labels, we can consistently use the labels in
prompts for the user without risk of confusion. This changes a huge amount
of command output:

This means that merge prompts like:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal, take (o)ther, or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote changed a which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
become:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal [working copy], take (o)ther [destination], or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote [source] changed a which local [dest] deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
where "working copy" and "destination" were supplied by the command that
requested the merge as labels for conflict markers, and thus should be
human-friendly.

  $ hg init
  $ echo This is file a1 > a
  $ echo This is file b1 > b
  $ hg add a b
  $ hg commit -m "commit #0"
  $ echo This is file b22 > b
  $ hg commit -m "comment #1"
  $ hg update 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm b
  $ hg commit -A -m "comment #2"
  removing b
  created new head
  $ hg update 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm b
  $ hg update -c 2
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg revert b
  $ hg update -c 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mv a c

Should abort:

  $ hg update 1
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  [255]
  $ mv c a

Should succeed:

  $ hg update 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved