view tests/test-merge8.t @ 29774:a7f8939641aa

merge: use labels in prompts to the user

Now that we persist the labels, we can consistently use the labels in
prompts for the user without risk of confusion. This changes a huge amount
of command output:

This means that merge prompts like:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal, take (o)ther, or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote changed a which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
become:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal [working copy], take (o)ther [destination], or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote [source] changed a which local [dest] deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
where "working copy" and "destination" were supplied by the command that
requested the merge as labels for conflict markers, and thus should be
human-friendly.

Test for changeset ba7c74081861
(update dirstate correctly for non-branchmerge updates)
  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m a
  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd a
  $ hg mv a b
  $ hg commit -m move
  $ echo b >> b
  $ hg commit -m b
  $ cd ../b
  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd ..