view tests/test-pull-permission.t @ 29774:a7f8939641aa

merge: use labels in prompts to the user Now that we persist the labels, we can consistently use the labels in prompts for the user without risk of confusion. This changes a huge amount of command output: This means that merge prompts like: no tool found to merge a keep (l)ocal, take (o)ther, or leave (u)nresolved? u and remote changed a which local deleted use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c become: no tool found to merge a keep (l)ocal [working copy], take (o)ther [destination], or leave (u)nresolved? u and remote [source] changed a which local [dest] deleted use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c where "working copy" and "destination" were supplied by the command that requested the merge as labels for conflict markers, and thus should be human-friendly.
author Simon Farnsworth <simonfar@fb.com>
date Fri, 12 Aug 2016 06:01:42 -0700
parents 8fb6844a4ff1
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

#require unix-permissions no-root

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo foo > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg ci -m "b"

  $ chmod -w .hg/store

  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone a b
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ chmod +w a/.hg/store # let test clean up

  $ cd b
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 1 changesets, 1 total revisions

  $ cd ..