view tests/test-unrelated-pull.t @ 29774:a7f8939641aa

merge: use labels in prompts to the user

Now that we persist the labels, we can consistently use the labels in
prompts for the user without risk of confusion. This changes a huge amount
of command output:

This means that merge prompts like:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal, take (o)ther, or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote changed a which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
become:
  no tool found to merge a
  keep (l)ocal [working copy], take (o)ther [destination], or leave (u)nresolved? u
and
  remote [source] changed a which local [dest] deleted
  use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? c
where "working copy" and "destination" were supplied by the command that
requested the merge as labels for conflict markers, and thus should be
human-friendly.

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo 123 > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "a" -u a

  $ cd ..
  $ hg init b
  $ cd b
  $ echo 321 > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg commit -m "b" -u b

  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  abort: repository is unrelated
  [255]

  $ hg pull -f ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  warning: repository is unrelated
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg heads
  changeset:   1:9a79c33a9db3
  tag:         tip
  parent:      -1:000000000000
  user:        a
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     a
  
  changeset:   0:01f8062b2de5
  user:        b
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     b
  

  $ cd ..