view tests/test-addremove @ 8742:a964ab624385

merge: allow merging going backwards New behavior is generally superior and more correct, except possibly with regards to missing files. hg up . is now effectively a no-op, which is probably the desired behavior for people expecting to move to tip, but may surprise people who were expecting deleted files to reappear. case 1: update to . a-w -> a-w classic: ancestor a missing recreated right? rmed recreated WRONG added forgotten WRONG changed preserved RIGHT conflicted can't happen backward merge: ancestor a (NO EFFECT) missing missing wrong? rm'ed rm'ed RIGHT added preserved RIGHT changed preserved RIGHT conflicted can't happen case 2: update to ancestor of . a-b-w -> b-w \ a classic: ancestor a missing recreated right? rmed recreated wrong? added forgotten wrong? changed preserved RIGHT conflicted preserved wrong? backwards merge: ancestor b missing missing or conflict right? rm'ed missing or conflict right? changed preserved RIGHT conflicted merge RIGHT added preserved right?
author Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
date Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:14:44 -0500
parents f975e986b4bf
children 627399330c7d
line wrap: on
line source

#!/bin/sh

hg init rep
cd rep
mkdir dir
touch foo dir/bar
hg -v addremove
hg -v commit -m "add 1" -d "1000000 0"
cd dir/
touch ../foo_2 bar_2
hg -v addremove
hg -v commit -m "add 2" -d "1000000 0"

cd ..
hg init sim
cd sim
echo a > a
echo a >> a
echo a >> a
echo c > c
hg commit -Ama
mv a b
rm c
echo d > d
hg addremove -s 50
hg commit -mb