Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-pull-update.t @ 29257:a9764ab80e11 stable 3.8.3
tests-subrepo-git: emit a different "pwned" message based on the test
Having a single "pwned" message which may or may not be emitted during the
tests for CVE-2016-3068 leads to extra confusion. Allow each test to emit
a more detailed message based on what the expectations are.
In both cases, we expect a version of git which has had the vulnerability
plugged, as well as a version of mercurial which also knows about
GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL. For the first test, we make sure GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL is
unset, meaning that the ext-protocol subrepo should be ignored; if it
isn't, there's either a problem with mercurial or the installed copy of
git.
For the second test, we explicitly allow ext-protocol subrepos, which means
that the subrepo will be accessed and a message emitted confirming that
this was, in fact, our intention.
author | Danek Duvall <danek.duvall@oracle.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 27 May 2016 15:20:03 -0700 |
parents | 5d9578d9ad1a |
children | 318a24b52eeb |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init t $ cd t $ echo 1 > foo $ hg ci -Am m adding foo $ cd .. $ hg clone t tt updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd tt $ echo 1.1 > foo $ hg ci -Am m $ cd ../t $ echo 1.2 > foo $ hg ci -Am m Should not update to the other topological branch: $ hg pull -u ../tt pulling from ../tt searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved 1 other heads for branch "default" $ cd ../tt Should not update to the other branch: $ hg pull -u ../t pulling from ../t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved 1 other heads for branch "default" $ HGMERGE=true hg merge merging foo 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -mm $ cd ../t Should work: $ hg pull -u ../tt pulling from ../tt searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (-1 heads) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Similarity between "hg update" and "hg pull -u" in handling bookmark ==================================================================== Test that updating activates the bookmark, which matches with the explicit destination of the update. $ echo 4 >> foo $ hg commit -m "#4" $ hg bookmark active-after-pull $ cd ../tt (1) activating by --rev BOOKMARK $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -r active-after-pull pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files adding remote bookmark active-after-pull 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (activating bookmark active-after-pull) $ hg parents -q 4:f815b3da6163 $ hg bookmarks * active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163 active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (2) activating by URL#BOOKMARK $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#active-after-pull pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files adding remote bookmark active-after-pull 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (activating bookmark active-after-pull) $ hg parents -q 4:f815b3da6163 $ hg bookmarks * active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163 active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q Test that updating deactivates current active bookmark, if the destination of the update is explicitly specified, and it doesn't match with the name of any exsiting bookmarks. $ cd ../t $ hg bookmark -d active-after-pull $ hg branch bar -q $ hg commit -m "#5 (bar #1)" $ cd ../tt (1) deactivating by --rev REV $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -r b5e4babfaaa7 pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (2) deactivating by --branch BRANCH $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -b bar pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (3) deactivating by URL#ANOTHER-BRANCH $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#bar pulling from $TESTTMP/t (glob) searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ cd ..