view tests/test-push-checkheads-pruned-B2.t @ 32558:aa91085cadf3

transaction: delete callbacks after use Before this change, localrepository instances that performed multiple transactions would leak transaction objects. This could occur when running `hg convert`. When running `hg convert`, the leak would be ~90 MB per 10,000 changesets as measured with the Mercurial repo itself. The leak I tracked down involved the "validate" closure from localrepository.transaction(). It appeared to be keeping a reference to the original transaction via __closure__. __del__ semantics and a circular reference involving the repo object may have also come into play. Attempting to refactor the "validate" closure proved to be difficult because the "tr" reference in that closure may reference an object that isn't created until transaction.__init__ is called. And the "validate" closure is passed as an argument to transaction.__init__. Plus there is a giant warning comment in "validate" about how hacky it is. I did not want to venture into the dragon den. Anyway, we've had problems with transactions causing leaks before. The solution then (14e683d6b273) is the same as the solution in this patch: drop references to callbacks after they are called. This not only breaks cycles in core Mercurial but can help break cycles in extensions that accidentally introduce them. While I only tracked down a leak due to self.validator, since this is the 2nd time I've tracked down leaks due to transaction callbacks I figure enough is enough and we should prevent the class of leak from occurring regardless of the variable. That's why all callback variables are now nuked.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Fri, 26 May 2017 13:27:21 -0700
parents 5622614e911c
children 53b3a1968aa6
line wrap: on
line source

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case B-2
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category B: simple case involving pruned changesets
TestCase 2: multi-changeset branch, head is pruned, rest is superceeded

.. old-state:
..
.. * 2 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old head is pruned
.. * 1 new branch succeeding to the other changeset in the old branch
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   B ⊗
..     |
..   A ø⇠◔ A'
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir B2
  $ cd B2
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd server
  $ mkcommit B0
  $ cd ../client
  $ hg pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/B2/server (glob)
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit A1
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(B0)"`
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  f6082bc4ffef (draft): A1
  |
  | x  d73caddc5533 (draft): B0
  | |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/B2/server (glob)
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  2 new obsolescence markers

  $ cd ../..