Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-rename-merge1.t @ 42590:ab416b5d9b91
tests: add more tests of copy tracing with removed and re-added files
We had a test where the destination of a copy was removed and then
added back. This patch adds similar cases where the break in history
instead happens to the source file. There are three versions of this:
1. The break happens before the rename.
2. The break happens on a branch parallel to the rename (where copy
tracing is done via the merge base)
3. The source is added on each side of the merge base. The break in
history is thus in the form of a deletion when going backwards to
the merge base and the re-add happens on the other branch.
I've also added calls to `hg graft` in these cases to show the
breakage in issue 6163.
Another factor in these cases is matching nodeid (checked in
copies._tracefile()). I've made two copies each of the cases to show
the impact of that. One of these is the same as a test in
test-rename-merge1.t, so I also deleted that test from there.
Some of these tests currently fail, where "fail" is based on my
current thinking of how things should work. I had initially thought
that we should be more strict about not tracing copies across commits
where the file did not exist, but issue 6163 made me reconsider.
The only test case here that behaved differently in 4.9 is the
exact case reported in issue 6163.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6599
author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:59:29 -0700 |
parents | c83c08cf02b7 |
children | d7622fdec3b5 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo foo > a $ echo foo > a2 $ hg add a a2 $ hg ci -m "start" $ hg mv a b $ hg mv a2 b2 $ hg ci -m "rename" $ hg co 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo blahblah > a $ echo blahblah > a2 $ hg mv a2 c2 $ hg ci -m "modify" created new head $ hg merge -y --debug unmatched files in local: c2 unmatched files in other: b b2 all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' * src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' ! src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' ! checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to: b2 c2 preserving a for resolve of b removing a b2: remote created -> g getting b2 b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge) picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False) merging a and b to b my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c premerge successful 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status -AC M b a M b2 R a C c2 $ cat b blahblah $ hg ci -m "merge" $ hg debugindex b rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 1 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f $ hg debugrename b b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66 This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames $ hg cp b b3 $ hg cp b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice' $ hg up '.^' 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm b3 b4 $ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess' We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113) $ hg cp b b3 $ hg mv b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset' $ hg up '.^' 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check for issue2642 $ hg init t $ cd t $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 # backport $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ hg ci -qm3 $ hg merge 2 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c0 $ cd .. Check for issue2089 $ hg init repo2089 $ cd repo2089 $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ echo c2 > f1 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 1 -q $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -Aqm3 $ hg up 2 -q $ hg merge 3 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c2 $ cd .. Check for issue3074 $ hg init repo3074 $ cd repo3074 $ echo foo > file $ hg add file $ hg commit -m "added file" $ hg mv file newfile $ hg commit -m "renamed file" $ hg update 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm file $ hg commit -m "deleted file" created new head $ hg merge --debug unmatched files in other: newfile all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' % checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0 note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to: newfile newfile: remote created -> g getting newfile 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M newfile $ cd ..