tests/test-merge-prompt.t
author Durham Goode <durham@fb.com>
Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:27:53 -0700
changeset 26305 ade5c488d622
parent 22589 9ab18a912c44
child 26850 00209e38e7d9
permissions -rw-r--r--
revset: remove existence check from min() and max() min() and max() would first do an existence check. Unfortunately existence checks can be slow in certain situations (like if the smartset is a list, and quickly iterable in both ascending and descending directions, then doing an existence check will start from the bottom, even if you want to check the max()). The fix is to not do the check, and just handle the error if it happens. In a large repo, this speeds up: hg log -r 'max(parents(. + .^) - (. + .^) & ::master)' from 3.5s to 0.85s. That revset is contrived and just for testing. In our real case we used 'bundle()' in place of '. + .^' Interesting perf numbers for the revset benchmarks: max(draft() and ::tip) => 0.027s to 0.0005s max(author(lmoscovicz)) => 2.48s to 0.57s min doesn't show any perf changes, but changing it as well will prevent a perf regression in my next patch. Result from revset benchmark revset #0: draft() and ::tip min max 0) 0.001971 0.001991 1) 0.001965 0.000428 21% revset #1: ::tip and draft() min max 0) 0.002017 0.001912 1) 0.001896 94% 0.000421 22% revset #2: author(lmoscovicz) min max 0) 1.049033 1.358913 1) 1.042508 0.319824 23% revset #3: author(lmoscovicz) or author(mpm) min max 0) 1.042512 1.367432 1) 1.019750 0.327750 23% revset #4: author(mpm) or author(lmoscovicz) min max 0) 1.050135 0.324924 1) 1.070698 0.319913 revset #5: roots((tip~100::) - (tip~100::tip)) min max 0) 0.000671 0.001018 1) 0.000605 90% 0.000946 92% revset #6: roots((0::) - (0::tip)) min max 0) 0.149714 0.152369 1) 0.098677 65% 0.100374 65% revset #7: (20000::) - (20000) min max 0) 0.051019 0.042747 1) 0.035586 69% 0.016267 38%

Test for
b5605d88dc27: Make ui.prompt repeat on "unrecognized response" again
 (issue897)

840e2b315c1f: Fix misleading error and prompts during update/merge
 (issue556)

  $ status() {
  >     echo "--- status ---"
  >     hg st -A file1 file2
  >     for file in file1 file2; do
  >         if [ -f $file ]; then
  >             echo "--- $file ---"
  >             cat $file
  >         else
  >             echo "*** $file does not exist"
  >         fi
  >     done
  > }

  $ hg init

  $ echo 1 > file1
  $ echo 2 > file2
  $ hg ci -Am 'added file1 and file2'
  adding file1
  adding file2

  $ hg rm file1
  $ echo changed >> file2
  $ hg ci -m 'removed file1, changed file2'

  $ hg co 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo changed >> file1
  $ hg rm file2
  $ hg ci -m 'changed file1, removed file2'
  created new head


Non-interactive merge:

  $ hg merge -y
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  M file2
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  --- file2 ---
  2
  changed


Interactive merge:

  $ hg co -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > c
  > d
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? d
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  file2: * (glob)
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  *** file2 does not exist


Interactive merge with bad input:

  $ hg co -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > foo
  > bar
  > d
  > baz
  > c
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? foo
  unrecognized response
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? bar
  unrecognized response
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? baz
  unrecognized response
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  M file2
  R file1
  *** file1 does not exist
  --- file2 ---
  2
  changed


Interactive merge with not enough input:

  $ hg co -C
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > d
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? abort: response expected
  [255]

  $ status
  --- status ---
  file2: * (glob)
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  *** file2 does not exist