hgweb: remove artificial width constraint from header in monoblue
This width property comes from the beginning of the monoblue theme itself, and
was used to stop the action header ("summary", "shortlog", "changelog", etc)
from clashing with the search form. But it still was happening (on smaller
screens, and with more actions added to hgweb over time).
Effectively, the hardcoded width was preventing the header from fitting into
the available screen space, since it always tried to be 900px wide, even if
that meant horizontal scroll on smaller screens and having the actions on two
lines where one should've been enough. For example,
http://selenic.com/hg/log?style=monoblue has the last two actions ("gz" and
"help") in the header on the second line, even when there seems to be enough
space on the first.
This patch makes the form float, which prevents it from overlaying/clashing
with the action header, and allows the latter to resize itself in the best
possible way.
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am1 # 0
adding foo
$ hg branch branchA
marked working directory as branch branchA
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ echo a1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma1 # 1
$ cd ..
$ hg init tt
$ cd tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
(run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ echo a2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma2 # 2
Create branch B:
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch branchB
marked working directory as branch branchB
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ echo b1 > foo
$ hg ci -mb1 # 3
$ cd ../tt
A new branch is there
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Develop both branches:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a3 > foo
$ hg ci -ma3 # 4
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b2 > foo
$ hg ci -mb2 # 5
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed, no new heads:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Add a head on other branch:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a4 > foo
$ hg ci -ma4 # 6
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.1 # 7
$ hg up 5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.2 # 8
created new head
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed because there is only one head on our branch:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.1 # 9
$ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.2 # 10
created new head
$ hg up 7
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.1 # 11
$ hg up -C 8
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.2 # 12
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Make changes on new branch on tt
$ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch branchC
marked working directory as branch branchC
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ echo b1 > bar
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar
Make changes on default branch on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
adding bar
Pull branchC from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
Make changes on default and branchC on tt
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)
$ hg up -C default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar1
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on tt"
adding bar1
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar2
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar2
Make changes on default and branchC on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up default
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar3
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default on t"
adding bar3
$ hg up branchC
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar4
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC on tt"
adding bar4
Pull from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+2 heads)
(run 'hg heads .' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ cd ..