Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-rename-merge1.t @ 51619:b08c5fbe0e70 stable
rust: blanket implementation of Graph for Graph references
The need comes from the fact that `AncestorsIterator` and many
Graph-related algorithms take ownership of the `Graph` they work with.
This, in turn is due to them needing to accept the `Index` instances
that are provided by the Python layers (that neither rhg nor `RHGitaly`
use, of course): the fact that nowadays the Python layer holds an object
that is itself implemented in Rust does not change the core problem that
they cannot be tracked by the borrow checker.
Even though it looks like cloning `Changelog` would be cheap, it seems
hard to guarantee that on the long run. The object is already too rich
for us to be comfortable with it, when using references is the most
natural and guaranteed way of proceeding.
The added test seems a bit superfleous, but it will act as a reminder
that this feature is really useful until something in the Mercurial code
base actually uses it.
author | Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:47:08 +0200 |
parents | 55c6ebd11cb9 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init repo $ cd repo $ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc $ echo foo > a $ echo foo > a2 $ hg add a a2 $ hg ci -m "start" $ hg mv a b $ hg mv a2 b2 $ hg ci -m "rename" $ hg co 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo blahblah > a $ echo blahblah > a2 $ hg mv a2 c2 $ hg ci -m "modify" created new head $ hg merge -y --debug unmatched files in local: c2 unmatched files in other: b b2 all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on local side: src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' ! on remote side: src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' * src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' ! checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to: b2 c2 b2: remote created -> g getting b2 preserving a for resolve of b removing a b: remote moved from a -> m picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False) merging a and b to b my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c premerge successful 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status -AC M b a M b2 R a C c2 $ cat b blahblah $ hg ci -m "merge" $ hg debugindex b rev linkrev nodeid p1-nodeid p2-nodeid 0 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 1 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f $ hg debugrename b b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66 This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames $ hg cp b b3 $ hg cp b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice' $ hg up '.^' 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm b3 b4 $ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess' We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113) $ hg cp b b3 $ hg mv b b4 $ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset' $ hg up '.^' 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg up 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved Check for issue2642 $ hg init t $ cd t $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 # backport $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ hg ci -qm3 $ hg merge 2 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c0 $ cd .. Check for issue2089 $ hg init repo2089 $ cd repo2089 $ echo c0 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm0 $ hg up null -q $ echo c1 > f1 $ hg ci -Aqm1 $ hg up 0 -q $ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local $ echo c2 > f1 $ hg ci -qm2 $ hg up 1 -q $ hg mv f1 f2 $ hg ci -Aqm3 $ hg up 2 -q $ hg merge 3 merging f1 and f2 to f2 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f2 c2 $ cd .. Check for issue3074 $ hg init repo3074 $ cd repo3074 $ echo foo > file $ hg add file $ hg commit -m "added file" $ hg mv file newfile $ hg commit -m "renamed file" $ hg update 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg rm file $ hg commit -m "deleted file" created new head $ hg merge --debug unmatched files in other: newfile all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on remote side: src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' % checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0 note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to: newfile newfile: remote created -> g getting newfile 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M newfile $ cd .. Create x and y, then modify y and rename x to z on one side of merge, and modify x and rename y to z on the other side. $ hg init conflicting-target $ cd conflicting-target $ echo x > x $ echo y > y $ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y' $ hg mv x z $ echo foo >> y $ hg ci -qm 'modify y, rename x to z' $ hg co -q 0 $ hg mv y z $ echo foo >> x $ hg ci -qm 'modify x, rename y to z' # We should probably tell the user about the conflicting rename sources. # Depending on which side they pick, we should take that rename and get # the changes to the source from the other side. The unchanged file should # remain. $ hg merge --debug 1 -t :merge3 all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted): on local side: src: 'y' -> dst: 'z' * on remote side: src: 'x' -> dst: 'z' * checking for directory renames resolving manifests branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False ancestor: 5151c134577e, local: 07fcbc9a74ed+, remote: f21419739508 starting 4 threads for background file closing (?) preserving z for resolve of z z: both renamed from y -> m picked tool ':merge3' for z (binary False symlink False changedelete False) merging z my z@07fcbc9a74ed+ other z@f21419739508 ancestor y@5151c134577e premerge successful 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ ls x z $ cat x x foo # 'z' should have had the added 'foo' line $ cat z x