tests/test-batching.py.out
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
Tue, 26 May 2015 13:02:28 -0700
branchstable
changeset 25294 b1b89a0a606d
parent 14621 84094c0d2724
child 33765 e2fc2122029c
permissions -rw-r--r--
transaction: really fix _addbackupentry key usage (issue4684) The fix in fd905b2bea59 is actually wrong. We now use the filename to match what '_addentry'. This whole untested code is quite suspicious. This seems to point that no one is ever running 'tr.find' for a backup file.


== Local
Ready.
Un and Deux
Eins und Zwei
One and Two
Nope
Eins und Zwei
Hello, John Smith
Ready.
Uno und Due

== Remote
Ready.
REQ: foo?one=Vo&two=Efvy
  -> Vo!boe!Efvy
Un and Deux
REQ: bar?b=Fjot&a=[xfj
  -> Fjot!voe![xfj
Eins und Zwei
REQ: batch?cmds=foo:one=Pof,two=Uxp;bar:b=Fjot,a=[xfj
  -> Pof!boe!Uxp;Fjot!voe![xfj
REQ: greet?name=Kpio!Tnjui
  -> Ifmmp-!Kpio!Tnjui
REQ: batch?cmds=bar:b=Vop,a=Evf
  -> Vop!voe!Evf
One and Two
Nope
Eins und Zwei
Hello, John Smith
Ready.
Uno und Due