Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 24847:b705e5ab3b07 stable
bundle2: capture transaction rollback message output (issue4614)
The output from the transaction rollback was not included into the reply bundle.
It was eventually caught by the usual 'unbundle' output capture and sent to the
client but the result was out of order on the client side. We now capture the
output for the transaction release and transmit it the same way as all other
output.
We should probably rethink the whole output capture things but this would not be
appropriate for stable.
The is still multiple cases were output failed to be properly capture, they will
be fixed in later changesets.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:20:36 +0100 |
parents | 0705f2ac79d6 |
children | 75be14993fda |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > import sys > print 'Using custom patch' > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print '--binary found !' > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..