view tests/test-revert-interactive.t @ 24847:b705e5ab3b07 stable

bundle2: capture transaction rollback message output (issue4614) The output from the transaction rollback was not included into the reply bundle. It was eventually caught by the usual 'unbundle' output capture and sent to the client but the result was out of order on the client side. We now capture the output for the transaction release and transmit it the same way as all other output. We should probably rethink the whole output capture things but this would not be appropriate for stable. The is still multiple cases were output failed to be properly capture, they will be fixed in later changesets.
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com>
date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:20:36 +0100
parents a85c4ed1132f
children f37a69ec3f47
line wrap: on
line source

Revert interactive tests
1 add and commit file f
2 add commit file folder1/g
3 add and commit file folder2/h
4 add and commit file folder1/i
5 commit change to file f
6 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
7 commit changes to files folder1/g folder2/h
8 revert interactive to commit id 2 (line 3 above), check that folder1/i is removed and
9 make workdir match 7
10 run the same test than 8 from within folder1 and check same expectations

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > interactive = true
  > [extensions]
  > record =
  > EOF


  $ mkdir -p a/folder1 a/folder2
  $ cd a
  $ hg init
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write("1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n")
  $ hg add f ; hg commit -m "adding f"
  $ cat f > folder1/g ; hg add folder1/g ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/g"
  $ cat f > folder2/h ; hg add folder2/h ; hg commit -m "adding folder2/h"
  $ cat f > folder1/i ; hg add folder1/i ; hg commit -m "adding folder1/i"
  >>> open('f', 'wb').write("a\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nb\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying f"
  >>> open('folder1/g', 'wb').write("c\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nd\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder1/g"
  >>> open('folder2/h', 'wb').write("e\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nf\n")
  $ hg commit -m "modifying folder2/h"
  $ hg tip
  changeset:   6:59dd6e4ab63a
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     modifying folder2/h
  
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  removing folder1/i (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f

Test that --interactive lift the need for --all

  $ echo q | hg revert -i -r 2
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
  1 hunks, 1 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] q
  
  abort: user quit
  [255]
  $ rm folder1/g.orig


  $ hg update -C 6
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg revert -i -r 2 --all -- << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  reverting f
  reverting folder1/g (glob)
  removing folder1/i (glob)
  reverting folder2/h (glob)
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  record change 1/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -b
  record change 2/6 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder1/g
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  -c
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  record change 3/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -2,6 +1,5 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  -d
  record change 4/6 to 'folder1/g'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  diff -r 89ac3d72e4a4 folder2/h
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'folder2/h'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ cat f
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat folder1/g
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  d
  $ cat folder2/h
  e
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  f
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  R folder1/i
  $ hg revert --interactive f << EOF
  > y
  > y
  > n
  > n
  > EOF
  diff -r 59dd6e4ab63a f
  2 hunks, 2 lines changed
  examine changes to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
  +a
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  record change 1/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] y
  
  @@ -1,5 +2,6 @@
   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
  +b
  record change 2/2 to 'f'? [Ynesfdaq?] n
  
  $ hg st
  M f
  M folder1/g
  R folder1/i
  ? f.orig
  $ cat f
  a
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  $ cat f.orig
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5