nodemap: gate the feature behind a new requirement
Now that the feature is working smoothly, a question was still open, should we
gate the feature behind a new requirement or just treat it as a cache to be
warmed by those who can and ignored by other.
The advantage of using the cache approach is a transparent upgrade/downgrade
story, making the feature easier to move to. However having out of date cache
can come with a significant performance hit for process who expect an up to
date cache but found none. In this case the file needs to be stored under
`.hg/cache`.
The "requirement" approach guarantee that the persistent nodemap is up to date.
However, it comes with a less flexible activation story since an explicite
upgrade is required. In this case the file can be stored in `.hg/store`.
This wiki page is relevant to this questions:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ComputedIndexPlan
So which one should we take? Another element came into plan, the persistent
nodemap use the `add` method of the transaction, it is used to keep track of a
file content before a transaction in case we need to rollback it back. It turns
out that the `transaction.add` API does not support file stored anywhere than
`.hg/store`. Making it support file stored elsewhere is possible, require a
change in on disk transaction format. Updating on disk file requires…
introducing a new requirements.
As a result, we pick the second option "gating the persistent nodemap behind a
new requirements".
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8417
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/1175
$ hg init
$ touch a
$ hg ci -Am0
adding a
$ hg mv a a1
$ hg ci -m1
$ hg co 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg mv a a2
$ hg up
note: possible conflict - a was renamed multiple times to:
a1
a2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg ci -m2
$ touch a
$ hg ci -Am3
adding a
$ hg mv a b
$ hg ci -Am4 a
$ hg ci --debug --traceback -Am5 b
committing files:
b
warning: can't find ancestor for 'b' copied from 'a'!
committing manifest
committing changelog
updating the branch cache
committed changeset 5:83a687e8a97c80992ba385bbfd766be181bfb1d1
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
checked 6 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
$ hg export --git tip
# HG changeset patch
# User test
# Date 0 0
# Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
# Node ID 83a687e8a97c80992ba385bbfd766be181bfb1d1
# Parent 1d1625283f71954f21d14c3d44d0ad3c019c597f
5
diff --git a/b b/b
new file mode 100644
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4476
$ hg init foo
$ cd foo
$ touch a && hg ci -Aqm a
$ hg mv a b
$ echo b1 >> b
$ hg ci -Aqm b1
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg mv a b
$ echo b2 >> b
$ hg ci -Aqm b2
$ hg graft 1
grafting 1:5974126fad84 "b1"
merging b
warning: conflicts while merging b! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
abort: unresolved conflicts, can't continue
(use 'hg resolve' and 'hg graft --continue')
[1]
$ echo a > b
$ echo b3 >> b
$ hg resolve --mark b
(no more unresolved files)
continue: hg graft --continue
$ hg graft --continue
grafting 1:5974126fad84 "b1"
$ hg log -f b -T 'changeset: {rev}:{node|short}\nsummary: {desc}\n\n'
changeset: 3:376d30ccffc0
summary: b1
changeset: 2:416baaa2e5e4
summary: b2
changeset: 0:3903775176ed
summary: a