tests/test-status-inprocess.py
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:16:23 +0200
changeset 44791 b81486b609a3
parent 43076 2372284d9457
child 45830 c102b704edb5
permissions -rwxr-xr-x
nodemap: gate the feature behind a new requirement Now that the feature is working smoothly, a question was still open, should we gate the feature behind a new requirement or just treat it as a cache to be warmed by those who can and ignored by other. The advantage of using the cache approach is a transparent upgrade/downgrade story, making the feature easier to move to. However having out of date cache can come with a significant performance hit for process who expect an up to date cache but found none. In this case the file needs to be stored under `.hg/cache`. The "requirement" approach guarantee that the persistent nodemap is up to date. However, it comes with a less flexible activation story since an explicite upgrade is required. In this case the file can be stored in `.hg/store`. This wiki page is relevant to this questions: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ComputedIndexPlan So which one should we take? Another element came into plan, the persistent nodemap use the `add` method of the transaction, it is used to keep track of a file content before a transaction in case we need to rollback it back. It turns out that the `transaction.add` API does not support file stored anywhere than `.hg/store`. Making it support file stored elsewhere is possible, require a change in on disk transaction format. Updating on disk file requires… introducing a new requirements. As a result, we pick the second option "gating the persistent nodemap behind a new requirements". Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8417

#!/usr/bin/env python
from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function

import sys

from mercurial import (
    commands,
    localrepo,
    ui as uimod,
)

print_ = print


def print(*args, **kwargs):
    """print() wrapper that flushes stdout buffers to avoid py3 buffer issues

    We could also just write directly to sys.stdout.buffer the way the
    ui object will, but this was easier for porting the test.
    """
    print_(*args, **kwargs)
    sys.stdout.flush()


u = uimod.ui.load()

print('% creating repo')
repo = localrepo.instance(u, b'.', create=True)

f = open('test.py', 'w')
try:
    f.write('foo\n')
finally:
    f.close

print('% add and commit')
commands.add(u, repo, b'test.py')
commands.commit(u, repo, message=b'*')
commands.status(u, repo, clean=True)


print('% change')
f = open('test.py', 'w')
try:
    f.write('bar\n')
finally:
    f.close()

# this would return clean instead of changed before the fix
commands.status(u, repo, clean=True, modified=True)