tests/test-update-reverse.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:16:23 +0200
changeset 44791 b81486b609a3
parent 44724 5c2a4f37eace
child 49621 55c6ebd11cb9
permissions -rw-r--r--
nodemap: gate the feature behind a new requirement Now that the feature is working smoothly, a question was still open, should we gate the feature behind a new requirement or just treat it as a cache to be warmed by those who can and ignored by other. The advantage of using the cache approach is a transparent upgrade/downgrade story, making the feature easier to move to. However having out of date cache can come with a significant performance hit for process who expect an up to date cache but found none. In this case the file needs to be stored under `.hg/cache`. The "requirement" approach guarantee that the persistent nodemap is up to date. However, it comes with a less flexible activation story since an explicite upgrade is required. In this case the file can be stored in `.hg/store`. This wiki page is relevant to this questions: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ComputedIndexPlan So which one should we take? Another element came into plan, the persistent nodemap use the `add` method of the transaction, it is used to keep track of a file content before a transaction in case we need to rollback it back. It turns out that the `transaction.add` API does not support file stored anywhere than `.hg/store`. Making it support file stored elsewhere is possible, require a change in on disk transaction format. Updating on disk file requires… introducing a new requirements. As a result, we pick the second option "gating the persistent nodemap behind a new requirements". Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8417

  $ hg init

  $ touch a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "Added a"

  $ touch main
  $ hg add main
  $ hg commit -m "Added main"
  $ hg checkout 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

'main' should be gone:

  $ ls -A
  .hg
  a

  $ touch side1
  $ hg add side1
  $ hg commit -m "Added side1"
  created new head
  $ touch side2
  $ hg add side2
  $ hg commit -m "Added side2"

  $ hg log
  changeset:   3:91ebc10ed028
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side2
  
  changeset:   2:b932d7dbb1e1
  parent:      0:c2eda428b523
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side1
  
  changeset:   1:71a760306caf
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added main
  
  changeset:   0:c2eda428b523
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added a
  

  $ hg heads
  changeset:   3:91ebc10ed028
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added side2
  
  changeset:   1:71a760306caf
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added main
  
  $ ls -A
  .hg
  a
  side1
  side2

  $ hg update --debug -C 1
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: False, force: True, partial: False
   ancestor: 91ebc10ed028+, local: 91ebc10ed028+, remote: 71a760306caf
   side1: other deleted -> r
  removing side1
   side2: other deleted -> r
  removing side2
   main: remote created -> g
  getting main
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ ls -A
  .hg
  a
  main