view tests/sslcerts/priv.pem @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----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-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----