view tests/svn/encoding.svndump @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

SVN-fs-dump-format-version: 2

UUID: afeb9c47-92ff-4c0c-9f72-e1f6eb8ac9af

Revision-number: 0
Prop-content-length: 56
Content-length: 56

K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:34:55.835945Z
PROPS-END

Revision-number: 1
Prop-content-length: 112
Content-length: 112

K 7
svn:log
V 10
init projA
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:34:55.909545Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: branches
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Content-length: 10

PROPS-END


Node-path: tags
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Content-length: 10

PROPS-END


Node-path: trunk
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Content-length: 10

PROPS-END


Revision-number: 2
Prop-content-length: 106
Content-length: 106

K 7
svn:log
V 5
hello
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:34:56.150049Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: trunk/à
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Content-length: 10

PROPS-END


Node-path: trunk/à/é
Node-kind: file
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Text-content-length: 2
Text-content-md5: e29311f6f1bf1af907f9ef9f44b8328b
Text-content-sha1: e983f374794de9c64e3d1c1de1d490c0756eeeff
Content-length: 12

PROPS-END
d


Node-path: trunk/é
Node-kind: file
Node-action: add
Prop-content-length: 10
Text-content-length: 2
Text-content-md5: 9ffbf43126e33be52cd2bf7e01d627f9
Text-content-sha1: 094e3afb2fe8dfe82f63731cdcd3b999f4856cff
Content-length: 12

PROPS-END
e


Revision-number: 3
Prop-content-length: 112
Content-length: 112

K 7
svn:log
V 10
copy files
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:34:59.089402Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: trunk/è
Node-kind: file
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 2
Node-copyfrom-path: trunk/é
Text-copy-source-md5: 9ffbf43126e33be52cd2bf7e01d627f9
Text-copy-source-sha1: 094e3afb2fe8dfe82f63731cdcd3b999f4856cff


Node-path: trunk/ù
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 2
Node-copyfrom-path: trunk/à


Node-path: trunk/à
Node-action: delete


Node-path: trunk/é
Node-action: delete


Revision-number: 4
Prop-content-length: 114
Content-length: 114

K 7
svn:log
V 12
remove files
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:35:00.165121Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: trunk/è
Node-action: delete


Node-path: trunk/ù
Node-action: delete


Revision-number: 5
Prop-content-length: 120
Content-length: 120

K 7
svn:log
V 18
branch to branché
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:35:03.079138Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: branches/branché
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 4
Node-copyfrom-path: trunk


Revision-number: 6
Prop-content-length: 121
Content-length: 121

K 7
svn:log
V 19
branch to branchée
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:35:06.060801Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: branches/branchée
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 5
Node-copyfrom-path: branches/branché


Revision-number: 7
Prop-content-length: 110
Content-length: 110

K 7
svn:log
V 9
tag trunk
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:35:09.061530Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: tags/branché
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 6
Node-copyfrom-path: trunk


Revision-number: 8
Prop-content-length: 114
Content-length: 114

K 7
svn:log
V 12
tag branché
K 10
svn:author
V 7
pmezard
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2009-06-21T16:35:11.068562Z
PROPS-END

Node-path: tags/branchée
Node-kind: dir
Node-action: add
Node-copyfrom-rev: 6
Node-copyfrom-path: branches/branchée