Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-batching.py @ 30435:b86a448a2965
zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0
As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.
This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.
The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.
The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.
In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800 |
parents | 544908ae36ce |
children | e2fc2122029c |
line wrap: on
line source
# test-batching.py - tests for transparent command batching # # Copyright 2011 Peter Arrenbrecht <peter@arrenbrecht.ch> # # This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the # GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version. from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function from mercurial import ( peer, wireproto, ) # equivalent of repo.repository class thing(object): def hello(self): return "Ready." # equivalent of localrepo.localrepository class localthing(thing): def foo(self, one, two=None): if one: return "%s and %s" % (one, two,) return "Nope" def bar(self, b, a): return "%s und %s" % (b, a,) def greet(self, name=None): return "Hello, %s" % name def batch(self): '''Support for local batching.''' return peer.localbatch(self) # usage of "thing" interface def use(it): # Direct call to base method shared between client and server. print(it.hello()) # Direct calls to proxied methods. They cause individual roundtrips. print(it.foo("Un", two="Deux")) print(it.bar("Eins", "Zwei")) # Batched call to a couple of (possibly proxied) methods. batch = it.batch() # The calls return futures to eventually hold results. foo = batch.foo(one="One", two="Two") foo2 = batch.foo(None) bar = batch.bar("Eins", "Zwei") # We can call non-batchable proxy methods, but the break the current batch # request and cause additional roundtrips. greet = batch.greet(name="John Smith") # We can also add local methods into the mix, but they break the batch too. hello = batch.hello() bar2 = batch.bar(b="Uno", a="Due") # Only now are all the calls executed in sequence, with as few roundtrips # as possible. batch.submit() # After the call to submit, the futures actually contain values. print(foo.value) print(foo2.value) print(bar.value) print(greet.value) print(hello.value) print(bar2.value) # local usage mylocal = localthing() print() print("== Local") use(mylocal) # demo remoting; mimicks what wireproto and HTTP/SSH do # shared def escapearg(plain): return (plain .replace(':', '::') .replace(',', ':,') .replace(';', ':;') .replace('=', ':=')) def unescapearg(escaped): return (escaped .replace(':=', '=') .replace(':;', ';') .replace(':,', ',') .replace('::', ':')) # server side # equivalent of wireproto's global functions class server(object): def __init__(self, local): self.local = local def _call(self, name, args): args = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args) return getattr(self, name)(**args) def perform(self, req): print("REQ:", req) name, args = req.split('?', 1) args = args.split('&') vals = dict(arg.split('=', 1) for arg in args) res = getattr(self, name)(**vals) print(" ->", res) return res def batch(self, cmds): res = [] for pair in cmds.split(';'): name, args = pair.split(':', 1) vals = {} for a in args.split(','): if a: n, v = a.split('=') vals[n] = unescapearg(v) res.append(escapearg(getattr(self, name)(**vals))) return ';'.join(res) def foo(self, one, two): return mangle(self.local.foo(unmangle(one), unmangle(two))) def bar(self, b, a): return mangle(self.local.bar(unmangle(b), unmangle(a))) def greet(self, name): return mangle(self.local.greet(unmangle(name))) myserver = server(mylocal) # local side # equivalent of wireproto.encode/decodelist, that is, type-specific marshalling # here we just transform the strings a bit to check we're properly en-/decoding def mangle(s): return ''.join(chr(ord(c) + 1) for c in s) def unmangle(s): return ''.join(chr(ord(c) - 1) for c in s) # equivalent of wireproto.wirerepository and something like http's wire format class remotething(thing): def __init__(self, server): self.server = server def _submitone(self, name, args): req = name + '?' + '&'.join(['%s=%s' % (n, v) for n, v in args]) return self.server.perform(req) def _submitbatch(self, cmds): req = [] for name, args in cmds: args = ','.join(n + '=' + escapearg(v) for n, v in args) req.append(name + ':' + args) req = ';'.join(req) res = self._submitone('batch', [('cmds', req,)]) return res.split(';') def batch(self): return wireproto.remotebatch(self) @peer.batchable def foo(self, one, two=None): if not one: yield "Nope", None encargs = [('one', mangle(one),), ('two', mangle(two),)] encresref = peer.future() yield encargs, encresref yield unmangle(encresref.value) @peer.batchable def bar(self, b, a): encresref = peer.future() yield [('b', mangle(b),), ('a', mangle(a),)], encresref yield unmangle(encresref.value) # greet is coded directly. It therefore does not support batching. If it # does appear in a batch, the batch is split around greet, and the call to # greet is done in its own roundtrip. def greet(self, name=None): return unmangle(self._submitone('greet', [('name', mangle(name),)])) # demo remote usage myproxy = remotething(myserver) print() print("== Remote") use(myproxy)