view tests/test-bisect3.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

# Here we create a simple DAG which has just enough of the required
# topology to test all the bisection status labels:
#
#           13--14
#          /
#   0--1--2--3---------9--10--11--12
#       \             /
#        4--5--6--7--8


  $ hg init

  $ echo '0' >a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg ci -u test -d '0 0' -m '0'
  $ echo '1' >a
  $ hg ci -u test -d '1 0' -m '1'

branch 2-3

  $ echo '2' >b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg ci -u test -d '2 0' -m '2'
  $ echo '3' >b
  $ hg ci -u test -d '3 0' -m '3'

branch 4-8

  $ hg up -r 1
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '4' >c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg ci -u test -d '4 0' -m '4'
  created new head
  $ echo '5' >c
  $ hg ci -u test -d '5 0' -m '5'
  $ echo '6' >c
  $ hg ci -u test -d '6 0' -m '6'
  $ echo '7' >c
  $ hg ci -u test -d '7 0' -m '7'
  $ echo '8' >c
  $ hg ci -u test -d '8 0' -m '8'

merge

  $ hg merge -r 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -u test -d '9 0' -m '9=8+3'

  $ echo '10' >a
  $ hg ci -u test -d '10 0' -m '10'
  $ echo '11' >a
  $ hg ci -u test -d '11 0' -m '11'
  $ echo '12' >a
  $ hg ci -u test -d '12 0' -m '12'

unrelated branch

  $ hg up -r 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '13' >d
  $ hg add d
  $ hg ci -u test -d '13 0' -m '13'
  created new head
  $ echo '14' >d
  $ hg ci -u test -d '14 0' -m '14'

mark changesets

  $ hg bisect --reset
  $ hg bisect --good 4
  $ hg bisect --good 6
  $ hg bisect --bad 12
  Testing changeset 9:2197c557e14c (6 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect --bad 10
  Testing changeset 8:e74a86251f58 (4 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect --skip 7
  Testing changeset 8:e74a86251f58 (4 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

test template

  $ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {bisect}\n'
  14:cbf2f3105bbf 
  13:e07efca37c43 
  12:98c6b56349c0 bad
  11:03f491376e63 bad (implicit)
  10:c012b15e2409 bad
  9:2197c557e14c untested
  8:e74a86251f58 untested
  7:a5f87041c899 skipped
  6:7d997bedcd8d good
  5:2dd1875f1028 good (implicit)
  4:2a1daef14cd4 good
  3:8417d459b90c ignored
  2:e1355ee1f23e ignored
  1:ce7c85e06a9f good (implicit)
  0:b4e73ffab476 good (implicit)
  $ hg log --template '{bisect|shortbisect} {rev}:{node|short}\n'
    14:cbf2f3105bbf
    13:e07efca37c43
  B 12:98c6b56349c0
  B 11:03f491376e63
  B 10:c012b15e2409
  U 9:2197c557e14c
  U 8:e74a86251f58
  S 7:a5f87041c899
  G 6:7d997bedcd8d
  G 5:2dd1875f1028
  G 4:2a1daef14cd4
  I 3:8417d459b90c
  I 2:e1355ee1f23e
  G 1:ce7c85e06a9f
  G 0:b4e73ffab476

test style

  $ hg log --style bisect
  changeset:   14:cbf2f3105bbf
  bisect:      
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000
  summary:     14
  
  changeset:   13:e07efca37c43
  bisect:      
  parent:      3:8417d459b90c
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   12:98c6b56349c0
  bisect:      bad
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000
  summary:     12
  
  changeset:   11:03f491376e63
  bisect:      bad (implicit)
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  changeset:   10:c012b15e2409
  bisect:      bad
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     10
  
  changeset:   9:2197c557e14c
  bisect:      untested
  parent:      8:e74a86251f58
  parent:      3:8417d459b90c
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9=8+3
  
  changeset:   8:e74a86251f58
  bisect:      untested
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000
  summary:     8
  
  changeset:   7:a5f87041c899
  bisect:      skipped
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000
  summary:     7
  
  changeset:   6:7d997bedcd8d
  bisect:      good
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000
  summary:     6
  
  changeset:   5:2dd1875f1028
  bisect:      good (implicit)
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000
  summary:     5
  
  changeset:   4:2a1daef14cd4
  bisect:      good
  parent:      1:ce7c85e06a9f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
  summary:     4
  
  changeset:   3:8417d459b90c
  bisect:      ignored
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
  summary:     3
  
  changeset:   2:e1355ee1f23e
  bisect:      ignored
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  summary:     2
  
  changeset:   1:ce7c85e06a9f
  bisect:      good (implicit)
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  summary:     1
  
  changeset:   0:b4e73ffab476
  bisect:      good (implicit)
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     0
  
  $ hg log --quiet --style bisect
    14:cbf2f3105bbf
    13:e07efca37c43
  B 12:98c6b56349c0
  B 11:03f491376e63
  B 10:c012b15e2409
  U 9:2197c557e14c
  U 8:e74a86251f58
  S 7:a5f87041c899
  G 6:7d997bedcd8d
  G 5:2dd1875f1028
  G 4:2a1daef14cd4
  I 3:8417d459b90c
  I 2:e1355ee1f23e
  G 1:ce7c85e06a9f
  G 0:b4e73ffab476

  $ hg --config extensions.color= --color=debug log --quiet --style bisect
  [log.bisect| ] 14:cbf2f3105bbf
  [log.bisect| ] 13:e07efca37c43
  [log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 12:98c6b56349c0
  [log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 11:03f491376e63
  [log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 10:c012b15e2409
  [log.bisect bisect.untested|U] 9:2197c557e14c
  [log.bisect bisect.untested|U] 8:e74a86251f58
  [log.bisect bisect.skipped|S] 7:a5f87041c899
  [log.bisect bisect.good|G] 6:7d997bedcd8d
  [log.bisect bisect.good|G] 5:2dd1875f1028
  [log.bisect bisect.good|G] 4:2a1daef14cd4
  [log.bisect bisect.ignored|I] 3:8417d459b90c
  [log.bisect bisect.ignored|I] 2:e1355ee1f23e
  [log.bisect bisect.good|G] 1:ce7c85e06a9f
  [log.bisect bisect.good|G] 0:b4e73ffab476