view tests/test-bundle2-pushback.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 622782ea9cf3
children 8e6f4939a69a
line wrap: on
line source

  $ cat > bundle2.py << EOF
  > """A small extension to test bundle2 pushback parts.
  > Current bundle2 implementation doesn't provide a way to generate those
  > parts, so they must be created by extensions.
  > """
  > from mercurial import bundle2, pushkey, exchange, util
  > def _newhandlechangegroup(op, inpart):
  >     """This function wraps the changegroup part handler for getbundle.
  >     It issues an additional pushkey part to send a new
  >     bookmark back to the client"""
  >     result = bundle2.handlechangegroup(op, inpart)
  >     if 'pushback' in op.reply.capabilities:
  >         params = {'namespace': 'bookmarks',
  >                   'key': 'new-server-mark',
  >                   'old': '',
  >                   'new': 'tip'}
  >         encodedparams = [(k, pushkey.encode(v)) for (k,v) in params.items()]
  >         op.reply.newpart('pushkey', mandatoryparams=encodedparams)
  >     else:
  >         op.reply.newpart('output', data='pushback not enabled')
  >     return result
  > _newhandlechangegroup.params = bundle2.handlechangegroup.params
  > bundle2.parthandlermapping['changegroup'] = _newhandlechangegroup
  > EOF

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [ui]
  > ssh = python "$TESTDIR/dummyssh"
  > username = nobody <no.reply@example.com>
  > 
  > [alias]
  > tglog = log -G -T "{desc} [{phase}:{node|short}]"
  > EOF

Set up server repository

  $ hg init server
  $ cd server
  $ echo c0 > f0
  $ hg commit -Am 0
  adding f0

Set up client repository

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/server client -q
  $ cd client

Enable extension
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > bundle2=$TESTTMP/bundle2.py
  > EOF

Without config

  $ cd ../client
  $ echo c1 > f1
  $ hg commit -Am 1
  adding f1
  $ hg push
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/server
  searching for changes
  remote: adding changesets
  remote: adding manifests
  remote: adding file changes
  remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  remote: pushback not enabled
  $ hg bookmark
  no bookmarks set

  $ cd ../server
  $ hg tglog
  o  1 [public:2b9c7234e035]
  |
  @  0 [public:6cee5c8f3e5b]
  



With config

  $ cd ../client
  $ echo '[experimental]' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo 'bundle2.pushback = True' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ echo c2 > f2
  $ hg commit -Am 2
  adding f2
  $ hg push
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/server
  searching for changes
  remote: adding changesets
  remote: adding manifests
  remote: adding file changes
  remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  $ hg bookmark
     new-server-mark           2:0a76dfb2e179

  $ cd ../server
  $ hg tglog
  o  2 [public:0a76dfb2e179]
  |
  o  1 [public:2b9c7234e035]
  |
  @  0 [public:6cee5c8f3e5b]