view tests/test-contrib-check-code.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 2a54cf92c773
children ca727147ff9f
line wrap: on
line source

  $ cat > correct.py <<EOF
  > def toto(arg1, arg2):
  >     del arg2
  >     return (5 + 6, 9)
  > EOF
  $ cat > wrong.py <<EOF
  > def toto( arg1, arg2):
  >     del(arg2)
  >     return ( 5+6, 9)
  > EOF
  $ cat > quote.py <<EOF
  > # let's use quote in comments
  > (''' ( 4x5 )
  > but """\\''' and finally''',
  > """let's fool checkpatch""", '1+2',
  > '"""', 42+1, """and
  > ( 4-1 ) """, "( 1+1 )\" and ")
  > a, '\\\\\\\\', "\\\\\\" x-2", "c-1"
  > EOF
  $ cat > classstyle.py <<EOF
  > class newstyle_class(object):
  >     pass
  > 
  > class oldstyle_class:
  >     pass
  > 
  > class empty():
  >     pass
  > 
  > no_class = 1:
  >     pass
  > EOF
  $ check_code="$TESTDIR"/../contrib/check-code.py
  $ "$check_code" ./wrong.py ./correct.py ./quote.py ./classstyle.py
  ./wrong.py:1:
   > def toto( arg1, arg2):
   gratuitous whitespace in () or []
  ./wrong.py:2:
   >     del(arg2)
   Python keyword is not a function
  ./wrong.py:3:
   >     return ( 5+6, 9)
   gratuitous whitespace in () or []
   missing whitespace in expression
  ./quote.py:5:
   > '"""', 42+1, """and
   missing whitespace in expression
  ./classstyle.py:4:
   > class oldstyle_class:
   old-style class, use class foo(object)
  ./classstyle.py:7:
   > class empty():
   class foo() creates old style object, use class foo(object)
  [1]
  $ cat > python3-compat.py << EOF
  > foo <> bar
  > reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
  > dict(key=value)
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" python3-compat.py
  python3-compat.py:1:
   > foo <> bar
   <> operator is not available in Python 3+, use !=
  python3-compat.py:2:
   > reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
   reduce is not available in Python 3+
  python3-compat.py:3:
   > dict(key=value)
   dict() is different in Py2 and 3 and is slower than {}
  [1]

  $ cat > foo.c <<EOF
  > void narf() {
  > 	strcpy(foo, bar);
  > 	// strcpy_s is okay, but this comment is not
  > 	strcpy_s(foo, bar);
  > }
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" ./foo.c
  ./foo.c:2:
   > 	strcpy(foo, bar);
   don't use strcpy, use strlcpy or memcpy
  ./foo.c:3:
   > 	// strcpy_s is okay, but this comment is not
   don't use //-style comments
  [1]

  $ cat > is-op.py <<EOF
  > # is-operator comparing number or string literal
  > x = None
  > y = x is 'foo'
  > y = x is "foo"
  > y = x is 5346
  > y = x is -6
  > y = x is not 'foo'
  > y = x is not "foo"
  > y = x is not 5346
  > y = x is not -6
  > EOF

  $ "$check_code" ./is-op.py
  ./is-op.py:3:
   > y = x is 'foo'
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:4:
   > y = x is "foo"
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:5:
   > y = x is 5346
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:6:
   > y = x is -6
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:7:
   > y = x is not 'foo'
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:8:
   > y = x is not "foo"
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:9:
   > y = x is not 5346
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:10:
   > y = x is not -6
   object comparison with literal
  [1]

  $ cat > for-nolineno.py <<EOF
  > except:
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" for-nolineno.py --nolineno
  for-nolineno.py:0:
   > except:
   naked except clause
  [1]

  $ cat > warning.t <<EOF
  >   $ function warnonly {
  >   > }
  >   $ diff -N aaa
  >   $ function onwarn {}
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" warning.t
  $ "$check_code" --warn warning.t
  warning.t:1:
   >   $ function warnonly {
   warning: don't use 'function', use old style
  warning.t:3:
   >   $ diff -N aaa
   warning: don't use 'diff -N'
  warning.t:4:
   >   $ function onwarn {}
   warning: don't use 'function', use old style
  [1]
  $ cat > raise-format.py <<EOF
  > raise SomeException, message
  > # this next line is okay
  > raise SomeException(arg1, arg2)
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" not-existing.py raise-format.py
  Skipping*not-existing.py* (glob)
  raise-format.py:1:
   > raise SomeException, message
   don't use old-style two-argument raise, use Exception(message)
  [1]

  $ cat > rst.py <<EOF
  > """problematic rst text
  > 
  > .. note::
  >     wrong
  > """
  > 
  > '''
  > 
  > .. note::
  > 
  >     valid
  > 
  > new text
  > 
  >     .. note::
  > 
  >         also valid
  > '''
  > 
  > """mixed
  > 
  > .. note::
  > 
  >   good
  > 
  >     .. note::
  >         plus bad
  > """
  > EOF
  $ $check_code -w rst.py
  rst.py:3:
   > .. note::
   warning: add two newlines after '.. note::'
  rst.py:26:
   >     .. note::
   warning: add two newlines after '.. note::'
  [1]

  $ cat > ./map-inside-gettext.py <<EOF
  > print _("map inside gettext %s" % v)
  > 
  > print _("concatenating " " by " " space %s" % v)
  > print _("concatenating " + " by " + " '+' %s" % v)
  > 
  > print _("mapping operation in different line %s"
  >         % v)
  > 
  > print _(
  >         "leading spaces inside of '(' %s" % v)
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" ./map-inside-gettext.py
  ./map-inside-gettext.py:1:
   > print _("map inside gettext %s" % v)
   don't use % inside _()
  ./map-inside-gettext.py:3:
   > print _("concatenating " " by " " space %s" % v)
   don't use % inside _()
  ./map-inside-gettext.py:4:
   > print _("concatenating " + " by " + " '+' %s" % v)
   don't use % inside _()
  ./map-inside-gettext.py:6:
   > print _("mapping operation in different line %s"
   don't use % inside _()
  ./map-inside-gettext.py:9:
   > print _(
   don't use % inside _()
  [1]

web templates

  $ mkdir -p mercurial/templates
  $ cat > mercurial/templates/example.tmpl <<EOF
  > {desc}
  > {desc|escape}
  > {desc|firstline}
  > {desc|websub}
  > EOF

  $ "$check_code" --warnings mercurial/templates/example.tmpl
  mercurial/templates/example.tmpl:2:
   > {desc|escape}
   warning: follow desc keyword with either firstline or websub
  [1]

'string join across lines with no space' detection

  $ cat > stringjoin.py <<EOF
  > foo = (' foo'
  >        'bar foo.'
  >        'bar foo:'
  >        'bar foo@'
  >        'bar foo%'
  >        'bar foo*'
  >        'bar foo+'
  >        'bar foo-'
  >        'bar')
  > EOF

'missing _() in ui message' detection

  $ cat > uigettext.py <<EOF
  > ui.status("% 10s %05d % -3.2f %*s %%"
  >           # this use '\\\\' instead of '\\', because the latter in
  >           # heredoc on shell becomes just '\'
  >           '\\\\ \n \t \0'
  >           """12345
  >           """
  >           '''.:*+-=
  >           ''' "%-6d \n 123456 .:*+-= foobar")
  > EOF

(Checking multiple invalid files at once examines whether caching
translation table for repquote() works as expected or not. All files
should break rules depending on result of repquote(), in this case)

  $ "$check_code" stringjoin.py uigettext.py
  stringjoin.py:1:
   > foo = (' foo'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:2:
   >        'bar foo.'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:3:
   >        'bar foo:'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:4:
   >        'bar foo@'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:5:
   >        'bar foo%'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:6:
   >        'bar foo*'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:7:
   >        'bar foo+'
   string join across lines with no space
  stringjoin.py:8:
   >        'bar foo-'
   string join across lines with no space
  uigettext.py:1:
   > ui.status("% 10s %05d % -3.2f %*s %%"
   missing _() in ui message (use () to hide false-positives)
  [1]