view tests/test-contrib.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents c3e9269d9602
children 8e6f4939a69a
line wrap: on
line source

Set vars:

  $ CONTRIBDIR="$TESTDIR/../contrib"

Prepare repo-a:

  $ hg init repo-a
  $ cd repo-a

  $ echo this is file a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m first

  $ echo adding to file a >> a
  $ hg commit -m second

  $ echo adding more to file a >> a
  $ hg commit -m third

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 3 changesets, 3 total revisions

Dumping revlog of file a to stdout:

  $ python "$CONTRIBDIR/dumprevlog" .hg/store/data/a.i
  file: .hg/store/data/a.i
  node: 183d2312b35066fb6b3b449b84efc370d50993d0
  linkrev: 0
  parents: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  length: 15
  -start-
  this is file a
  
  -end-
  node: b1047953b6e6b633c0d8197eaa5116fbdfd3095b
  linkrev: 1
  parents: 183d2312b35066fb6b3b449b84efc370d50993d0 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  length: 32
  -start-
  this is file a
  adding to file a
  
  -end-
  node: 8c4fd1f7129b8cdec6c7f58bf48fb5237a4030c1
  linkrev: 2
  parents: b1047953b6e6b633c0d8197eaa5116fbdfd3095b 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  length: 54
  -start-
  this is file a
  adding to file a
  adding more to file a
  
  -end-

Dump all revlogs to file repo.dump:

  $ find .hg/store -name "*.i" | sort | xargs python "$CONTRIBDIR/dumprevlog" > ../repo.dump
  $ cd ..

Undumping into repo-b:

  $ hg init repo-b
  $ cd repo-b
  $ python "$CONTRIBDIR/undumprevlog" < ../repo.dump
  .hg/store/00changelog.i
  .hg/store/00manifest.i
  .hg/store/data/a.i
  $ cd ..

Rebuild fncache with clone --pull:

  $ hg clone --pull -U repo-b repo-c
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 1 files

Verify:

  $ hg -R repo-c verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  1 files, 3 changesets, 3 total revisions

Compare repos:

  $ hg -R repo-c incoming repo-a
  comparing with repo-a
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  [1]

  $ hg -R repo-a incoming repo-c
  comparing with repo-c
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  [1]

Test simplemerge command:

  $ cp "$CONTRIBDIR/simplemerge" .
  $ echo base > base
  $ echo local > local
  $ cat base >> local
  $ cp local orig
  $ cat base > other
  $ echo other >> other

changing local directly

  $ python simplemerge local base other && echo "merge succeeded"
  merge succeeded
  $ cat local
  local
  base
  other
  $ cp orig local

printing to stdout

  $ python simplemerge -p local base other
  local
  base
  other

local:

  $ cat local
  local
  base

conflicts

  $ cp base conflict-local
  $ cp other conflict-other
  $ echo not other >> conflict-local
  $ echo end >> conflict-local
  $ echo end >> conflict-other

  $ python simplemerge -p conflict-local base conflict-other
  base
  <<<<<<< conflict-local
  not other
  =======
  other
  >>>>>>> conflict-other
  end
  [1]

1 label

  $ python simplemerge -p -L foo conflict-local base conflict-other
  base
  <<<<<<< foo
  not other
  =======
  other
  >>>>>>> conflict-other
  end
  [1]

2 labels

  $ python simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar conflict-local base conflict-other
  base
  <<<<<<< foo
  not other
  =======
  other
  >>>>>>> bar
  end
  [1]

3 labels

  $ python simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar -L base conflict-local base conflict-other
  base
  <<<<<<< foo
  not other
  end
  ||||||| base
  =======
  other
  end
  >>>>>>> bar
  [1]

too many labels

  $ python simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar -L baz -L buz conflict-local base conflict-other
  abort: can only specify three labels.
  [255]

binary file

  $ $PYTHON -c "f = file('binary-local', 'w'); f.write('\x00'); f.close()"
  $ cat orig >> binary-local
  $ python simplemerge -p binary-local base other
  warning: binary-local looks like a binary file.
  [1]

binary file --text

  $ python simplemerge -a -p binary-local base other 2>&1
  warning: binary-local looks like a binary file.
  \x00local (esc)
  base
  other

help

  $ python simplemerge --help
  simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER
  
      Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set.
  
      Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER.
  
      By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation.
  
  options:
   -L --label       labels to use on conflict markers
   -a --text        treat all files as text
   -p --print       print results instead of overwriting LOCAL
      --no-minimal  no effect (DEPRECATED)
   -h --help        display help and exit
   -q --quiet       suppress output

wrong number of arguments

  $ python simplemerge
  simplemerge: wrong number of arguments
  simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER
  
      Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set.
  
      Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER.
  
      By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation.
  
  options:
   -L --label       labels to use on conflict markers
   -a --text        treat all files as text
   -p --print       print results instead of overwriting LOCAL
      --no-minimal  no effect (DEPRECATED)
   -h --help        display help and exit
   -q --quiet       suppress output
  [1]

bad option

  $ python simplemerge --foo -p local base other
  simplemerge: option --foo not recognized
  simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER
  
      Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set.
  
      Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER.
  
      By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation.
  
  options:
   -L --label       labels to use on conflict markers
   -a --text        treat all files as text
   -p --print       print results instead of overwriting LOCAL
      --no-minimal  no effect (DEPRECATED)
   -h --help        display help and exit
   -q --quiet       suppress output
  [1]