view tests/test-convert-cvs-detectmerge.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

#require cvs

Test config convert.cvsps.mergefrom config setting.
(Should test similar mergeto feature, but I don't understand it yet.)
Requires builtin cvsps.

  $ CVSROOT=`pwd`/cvsrepo
  $ export CVSROOT

  $ cvscall()
  > {
  >     cvs -f "$@"
  > }

output of 'cvs ci' varies unpredictably, so just discard it
XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic

  $ cvsci()
  > {
  >     sleep 1
  >     cvs -f ci "$@" > /dev/null
  > }

XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [extensions]
  > convert =
  > [convert]
  > cvsps.cache = 0
  > cvsps.mergefrom = \[MERGE from (\S+)\]
  > EOF

create cvs repository with one project

  $ cvscall -q -d "$CVSROOT" init
  $ mkdir cvsrepo/proj

populate cvs repository

  $ cvscall -Q co proj
  $ cd proj
  $ touch file1
  $ cvscall -Q add file1
  $ cvsci -m"add file1 on trunk"
  cvs commit: Examining .

create two release branches

  $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_0
  T file1
  $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_1
  T file1

modify file1 on branch v1_0

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_0
  $ sleep 1
  $ echo "change" >> file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text"
  cvs commit: Examining .

make unrelated change on v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ touch unrelated
  $ cvscall -Q add unrelated
  $ cvsci -m"unrelated change"
  cvs commit: Examining .

merge file1 to v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_0
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.2.1 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_0]"
  cvs commit: Examining .

merge change to trunk

  $ cvscall -Q update -A
  $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.1
  Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.4.1 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_1]"
  cvs commit: Examining .

non-merged change on trunk

  $ echo "foo" > file2
  $ cvscall -Q add file2
  $ cvsci -m"add file2 on trunk" file2

this will create rev 1.3
change on trunk to backport

  $ echo "backport me" >> file1
  $ cvsci -m"add other text" file1
  $ cvscall log file1
  
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  Working file: file1
  head: 1.3
  branch:
  locks: strict
  access list:
  symbolic names:
  	v1_1: 1.1.0.4
  	v1_0: 1.1.0.2
  keyword substitution: kv
  total revisions: 5;	selected revisions: 5
  description:
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.3
  date: * (glob)
  add other text
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.2
  date: * (glob)
  add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1
  date: * (glob)
  branches:  1.1.2;  1.1.4;
  add file1 on trunk
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1.4.1
  date: * (glob)
  add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1.2.1
  date: * (glob)
  add text
  =============================================================================

XXX how many ways are there to spell "trunk" with CVS?
backport trunk change to v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ cvscall -Q update -j1.2 -j1.3 file1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  Merging differences between 1.2 and 1.3 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add other text [MERGE from HEAD]" file1

fix bug on v1_1, merge to trunk with error

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ echo "merge forward" >> file1
  $ cvscall -Q tag unmerged
  $ cvsci -m"fix file1"
  cvs commit: Examining .
  $ cvscall -Q update -A
  $ cvscall -Q update -junmerged -jv1_1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.2
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.3
  Merging differences between 1.1.4.2 and 1.1.4.3 into file1

note the typo in the commit log message

  $ cvsci -m"fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]"
  cvs commit: Examining .
  $ cvs -Q tag -d unmerged

convert to hg

  $ cd ..
  $ hg convert proj proj.hg
  initializing destination proj.hg repository
  connecting to $TESTTMP/cvsrepo
  scanning source...
  collecting CVS rlog
  12 log entries
  creating changesets
  warning: CVS commit message references non-existent branch 'v1-1':
  fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  10 changeset entries
  sorting...
  converting...
  9 add file1 on trunk
  8 unrelated change
  7 add text
  6 add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  5 add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  4 add file2 on trunk
  3 add other text
  2 add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  1 fix file1
  0 fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]

complete log

  $ template="{rev}: '{branches}' {desc}\n"
  $ hg -R proj.hg log --template="$template"
  9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  8: 'v1_1' fix file1
  7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  6: '' add other text
  5: '' add file2 on trunk
  4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  2: 'v1_0' add text
  1: 'v1_1' unrelated change
  0: '' add file1 on trunk

graphical log

  $ hg -R proj.hg log -G --template="$template"
  o  9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  |
  | o  8: 'v1_1' fix file1
  | |
  | o  7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  |/|
  o |  6: '' add other text
  | |
  o |  5: '' add file2 on trunk
  | |
  o |  4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  |\|
  | o    3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  | |\
  +---o  2: 'v1_0' add text
  | |
  | o  1: 'v1_1' unrelated change
  |/
  o  0: '' add file1 on trunk