view tests/test-convert-darcs.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

#require darcs

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "convert=" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ DARCS_EMAIL='[e-mail]'; export DARCS_EMAIL

initialize darcs repo

  $ mkdir darcs-repo
  $ cd darcs-repo
  $ darcs init -q
  $ echo a > a
  $ darcs record -a -l -m p0
  Finished recording patch 'p0'
  $ cd ..

branch and update

  $ darcs get -q darcs-repo darcs-clone >/dev/null
  $ cd darcs-clone
  $ echo c >> a
  $ echo c > c
  $ darcs record -a -l -m p1.1
  Finished recording patch 'p1.1'
  $ cd ..

skip if we can't import elementtree

  $ if hg convert darcs-repo darcs-dummy 2>&1 | grep ElementTree > /dev/null; then
  >     echo 'skipped: missing feature: elementtree module'
  >     exit 80
  > fi

update source

  $ cd darcs-repo
  $ echo b >> a
  $ echo b > b
  $ darcs record -a -l -m p1.2
  Finished recording patch 'p1.2'

  $ darcs pull -q -a --no-set-default ../darcs-clone
  Backing up ./a(*) (glob)
  We have conflicts in the following files:
  ./a
   (?)
  $ sleep 1
  $ echo e > a
  $ echo f > f
  $ mkdir dir
  $ echo d > dir/d
  $ echo d > dir/d2
  $ darcs record -a -l -m p2
  Finished recording patch 'p2'

test file and directory move

  $ darcs mv -q f ff

Test remove + move

  $ darcs remove -q dir/d2
  $ rm dir/d2
  $ darcs mv -q dir dir2
  $ darcs record -a -l -m p3
  Finished recording patch 'p3'

The converter does not currently handle patch conflicts very well.
When they occur, it reverts *all* changes and moves forward,
letting the conflict resolving patch fix collisions.
Unfortunately, non-conflicting changes, like the addition of the
"c" file in p1.1 patch are reverted too.
Just to say that manifest not listing "c" here is a bug.

  $ cd ..
  $ hg convert darcs-repo darcs-repo-hg
  initializing destination darcs-repo-hg repository
  scanning source...
  sorting...
  converting...
  4 p0
  3 p1.2
  2 p1.1
  1 p2
  0 p3
  $ hg log -R darcs-repo-hg -g --template '{rev} "{desc|firstline}" ({author}) files: {files}\n' "$@"
  4 "p3" ([e-mail]) files: dir/d dir/d2 dir2/d f ff
  3 "p2" ([e-mail]) files: a dir/d dir/d2 f
  2 "p1.1" ([e-mail]) files: 
  1 "p1.2" ([e-mail]) files: a b
  0 "p0" ([e-mail]) files: a

  $ hg up -q -R darcs-repo-hg
  $ hg -R darcs-repo-hg manifest --debug
  7225b30cdf38257d5cc7780772c051b6f33e6d6b 644   a
  1e88685f5ddec574a34c70af492f95b6debc8741 644   b
  37406831adc447ec2385014019599dfec953c806 644   dir2/d
  b783a337463792a5c7d548ad85a7d3253c16ba8c 644   ff

#if no-outer-repo

try converting darcs1 repository

  $ hg clone -q "$TESTDIR/bundles/darcs1.hg" darcs
  $ hg convert -s darcs darcs/darcs1 2>&1 | grep darcs-1.0
  darcs-1.0 repository format is unsupported, please upgrade

#endif