view tests/test-convert-hg-source.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > convert=
  > [convert]
  > hg.saverev=False
  > EOF
  $ hg init orig
  $ cd orig
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo bar > bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo bar' -d '0 0'
  $ echo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo' -d '1 0'
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg copy --after --force foo bar
  $ hg copy foo baz
  $ hg ci -m 'make bar and baz copies of foo' -d '2 0'
  created new head

Test that template can print all file copies (issue4362)
  $ hg log -r . --template "{file_copies % ' File: {file_copy}\n'}"
   File: bar (foo)
   File: baz (foo)

  $ hg bookmark premerge1
  $ hg merge -r 1
  merging baz and foo to baz
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m 'merge local copy' -d '3 0'
  $ hg up -C 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (leaving bookmark premerge1)
  $ hg bookmark premerge2
  $ hg merge 2
  merging foo and baz to baz
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m 'merge remote copy' -d '4 0'
  created new head

Make and delete some tags

  $ hg tag that
  $ hg tag --remove that
  $ hg tag this

#if execbit
  $ chmod +x baz
#else
  $ echo some other change to make sure we get a rev 5 > baz
#endif
  $ hg ci -m 'mark baz executable' -d '5 0'
  $ cd ..
  $ hg convert --datesort orig new 2>&1 | grep -v 'subversion python bindings could not be loaded'
  initializing destination new repository
  scanning source...
  sorting...
  converting...
  8 add foo bar
  7 change foo
  6 make bar and baz copies of foo
  5 merge local copy
  4 merge remote copy
  3 Added tag that for changeset 88586c4e9f02
  2 Removed tag that
  1 Added tag this for changeset c56a7f387039
  0 mark baz executable
  updating bookmarks
  $ cd new
  $ hg out ../orig
  comparing with ../orig
  searching for changes
  no changes found
  [1]
#if execbit
  $ hg bookmarks
     premerge1                 3:973ef48a98a4
     premerge2                 8:91d107c423ba
#else
Different hash because no x bit
  $ hg bookmarks
     premerge1                 3:973ef48a98a4
     premerge2                 8:3537b15eaaca
#endif

Test that redoing a convert results in an identical graph
  $ cd ../
  $ rm new/.hg/shamap
  $ hg convert --datesort orig new 2>&1 | grep -v 'subversion python bindings could not be loaded'
  scanning source...
  sorting...
  converting...
  8 add foo bar
  7 change foo
  6 make bar and baz copies of foo
  5 merge local copy
  4 merge remote copy
  3 Added tag that for changeset 88586c4e9f02
  2 Removed tag that
  1 Added tag this for changeset c56a7f387039
  0 mark baz executable
  updating bookmarks
  $ hg -R new log -G -T '{rev} {desc}'
  o  8 mark baz executable
  |
  o  7 Added tag this for changeset c56a7f387039
  |
  o  6 Removed tag that
  |
  o  5 Added tag that for changeset 88586c4e9f02
  |
  o    4 merge remote copy
  |\
  +---o  3 merge local copy
  | |/
  | o  2 make bar and baz copies of foo
  | |
  o |  1 change foo
  |/
  o  0 add foo bar
  

check shamap LF and CRLF handling

  $ cat > rewrite.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > # Interlace LF and CRLF
  > lines = [(l.rstrip() + ((i % 2) and '\n' or '\r\n'))
  >          for i, l in enumerate(file(sys.argv[1]))]
  > file(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write(''.join(lines))
  > EOF
  $ python rewrite.py new/.hg/shamap
  $ cd orig
  $ hg up -qC 1
  $ echo foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -qm 'change foo again'
  $ hg up -qC 2
  $ echo foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -qm 'change foo again again'
  $ cd ..
  $ hg convert --datesort orig new 2>&1 | grep -v 'subversion python bindings could not be loaded'
  scanning source...
  sorting...
  converting...
  1 change foo again again
  0 change foo again
  updating bookmarks

init broken repository

  $ hg init broken
  $ cd broken
  $ echo a >> a
  $ echo b >> b
  $ hg ci -qAm init
  $ echo a >> a
  $ echo b >> b
  $ hg copy b c
  $ hg ci -qAm changeall
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo bc >> b
  $ hg ci -m changebagain
  created new head
  $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg -q merge
  $ hg ci -m merge
  $ hg mv b d
  $ hg ci -m moveb

break it

  $ rm .hg/store/data/b.*
  $ cd ..
  $ hg --config convert.hg.ignoreerrors=True convert broken fixed
  initializing destination fixed repository
  scanning source...
  sorting...
  converting...
  4 init
  ignoring: data/b.i@1e88685f5dde: no match found
  3 changeall
  2 changebagain
  1 merge
  0 moveb
  $ hg -R fixed verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  3 files, 5 changesets, 5 total revisions

manifest -r 0

  $ hg -R fixed manifest -r 0
  a

manifest -r tip

  $ hg -R fixed manifest -r tip
  a
  c
  d