view tests/test-export.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ touch foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11; do
  >    echo "foo-$i" >> foo
  >    hg ci -m "foo-$i"
  > done

  $ for out in "%nof%N" "%%%H" "%b-%R" "%h" "%r" "%m"; do
  >    echo
  >    echo "# foo-$out.patch"
  >    hg export -v -o "foo-$out.patch" 2:tip
  > done
  
  # foo-%nof%N.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-01of10.patch
  foo-02of10.patch
  foo-03of10.patch
  foo-04of10.patch
  foo-05of10.patch
  foo-06of10.patch
  foo-07of10.patch
  foo-08of10.patch
  foo-09of10.patch
  foo-10of10.patch
  
  # foo-%%%H.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-%617188a1c80f869a7b66c85134da88a6fb145f67.patch
  foo-%dd41a5ff707a5225204105611ba49cc5c229d55f.patch
  foo-%f95a5410f8664b6e1490a4af654e4b7d41a7b321.patch
  foo-%4346bcfde53b4d9042489078bcfa9c3e28201db2.patch
  foo-%afda8c3a009cc99449a05ad8aa4655648c4ecd34.patch
  foo-%35284ce2b6b99c9d2ac66268fe99e68e1974e1aa.patch
  foo-%9688c41894e6931305fa7165a37f6568050b4e9b.patch
  foo-%747d3c68f8ec44bb35816bfcd59aeb50b9654c2f.patch
  foo-%5f17a83f5fbd9414006a5e563eab4c8a00729efd.patch
  foo-%f3acbafac161ec68f1598af38f794f28847ca5d3.patch
  
  # foo-%b-%R.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-repo-2.patch
  foo-repo-3.patch
  foo-repo-4.patch
  foo-repo-5.patch
  foo-repo-6.patch
  foo-repo-7.patch
  foo-repo-8.patch
  foo-repo-9.patch
  foo-repo-10.patch
  foo-repo-11.patch
  
  # foo-%h.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-617188a1c80f.patch
  foo-dd41a5ff707a.patch
  foo-f95a5410f866.patch
  foo-4346bcfde53b.patch
  foo-afda8c3a009c.patch
  foo-35284ce2b6b9.patch
  foo-9688c41894e6.patch
  foo-747d3c68f8ec.patch
  foo-5f17a83f5fbd.patch
  foo-f3acbafac161.patch
  
  # foo-%r.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-02.patch
  foo-03.patch
  foo-04.patch
  foo-05.patch
  foo-06.patch
  foo-07.patch
  foo-08.patch
  foo-09.patch
  foo-10.patch
  foo-11.patch
  
  # foo-%m.patch
  exporting patches:
  foo-foo_2.patch
  foo-foo_3.patch
  foo-foo_4.patch
  foo-foo_5.patch
  foo-foo_6.patch
  foo-foo_7.patch
  foo-foo_8.patch
  foo-foo_9.patch
  foo-foo_10.patch
  foo-foo_11.patch

Doing it again clobbers the files rather than appending:
  $ hg export -v -o "foo-%m.patch" 2:3
  exporting patches:
  foo-foo_2.patch
  foo-foo_3.patch
  $ grep HG foo-foo_2.patch | wc -l
  \s*1 (re)
  $ grep HG foo-foo_3.patch | wc -l
  \s*1 (re)

Exporting 4 changesets to a file:

  $ hg export -o export_internal 1 2 3 4
  $ grep HG export_internal | wc -l
  \s*4 (re)

Doing it again clobbers the file rather than appending:
  $ hg export -o export_internal 1 2 3 4
  $ grep HG export_internal | wc -l
  \s*4 (re)

Exporting 4 changesets to stdout:

  $ hg export 1 2 3 4 | grep HG | wc -l
  \s*4 (re)

Exporting revision -2 to a file:

  $ hg export -- -2
  # HG changeset patch
  # User test
  # Date 0 0
  #      Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  # Node ID 5f17a83f5fbd9414006a5e563eab4c8a00729efd
  # Parent  747d3c68f8ec44bb35816bfcd59aeb50b9654c2f
  foo-10
  
  diff -r 747d3c68f8ec -r 5f17a83f5fbd foo
  --- a/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  +++ b/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
   foo-7
   foo-8
   foo-9
  +foo-10

No filename should be printed if stdout is specified explicitly:

  $ hg export -v 1 -o -
  exporting patch:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User test
  # Date 0 0
  #      Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  # Node ID d1c9656e973cfb5aebd5499bbd2cb350e3b12266
  # Parent  871558de6af2e8c244222f8eea69b782c94ce3df
  foo-1
  
  diff -r 871558de6af2 -r d1c9656e973c foo
  --- a/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  +++ b/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
   foo-0
  +foo-1

Checking if only alphanumeric characters are used in the file name (%m option):

  $ echo "line" >> foo
  $ hg commit -m " !\"#$%&(,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\\]"'^'"_\`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~"
  $ hg export -v -o %m.patch tip
  exporting patch:
  ____________0123456789_______ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ______abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz____.patch

Catch exporting unknown revisions (especially empty revsets, see issue3353)

  $ hg export
  # HG changeset patch
  # User test
  # Date 0 0
  #      Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  # Node ID 197ecd81a57f760b54f34a58817ad5b04991fa47
  # Parent  f3acbafac161ec68f1598af38f794f28847ca5d3
   !"#$%&(,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~
  
  diff -r f3acbafac161 -r 197ecd81a57f foo
  --- a/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  +++ b/foo	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
   foo-9
   foo-10
   foo-11
  +line

  $ hg export ""
  hg: parse error: empty query
  [255]
  $ hg export 999
  abort: unknown revision '999'!
  [255]
  $ hg export "not all()"
  abort: export requires at least one changeset
  [255]

Check for color output
  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [color]
  > mode = ansi
  > [extensions]
  > color =
  > EOF

  $ hg export --color always --nodates tip
  # HG changeset patch
  # User test
  # Date 0 0
  #      Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  # Node ID * (glob)
  # Parent * (glob)
   !"#$%&(,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~
  
  \x1b[0;1mdiff -r f3acbafac161 -r 197ecd81a57f foo\x1b[0m (esc)
  \x1b[0;31;1m--- a/foo\x1b[0m (esc)
  \x1b[0;32;1m+++ b/foo\x1b[0m (esc)
  \x1b[0;35m@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@\x1b[0m (esc)
   foo-9
   foo-10
   foo-11
  \x1b[0;32m+line\x1b[0m (esc)


  $ cd ..