Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-filebranch.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965
zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0
As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.
This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.
The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.
The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.
In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800 |
parents | 7e9cbb9c6053 |
children | 2428e8ec0793 |
line wrap: on
line source
This test makes sure that we don't mark a file as merged with its ancestor when we do a merge. $ cat <<EOF > merge > import sys, os > print "merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1]) > EOF $ HGMERGE="python ../merge"; export HGMERGE Creating base: $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo 1 > foo $ echo 1 > bar $ echo 1 > baz $ echo 1 > quux $ hg add foo bar baz quux $ hg commit -m "base" $ cd .. $ hg clone a b updating to branch default 4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Creating branch a: $ cd a $ echo 2a > foo $ echo 2a > bar $ hg commit -m "branch a" Creating branch b: $ cd .. $ cd b $ echo 2b > foo $ echo 2b > baz $ hg commit -m "branch b" We shouldn't have anything but n state here: $ hg debugstate --nodates | grep -v "^n" [1] Merging: $ hg pull ../a pulling from ../a searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge) $ hg merge -v resolving manifests getting bar merging foo merging for foo 1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo 2m > foo $ echo 2b > baz $ echo new > quux $ hg ci -m "merge" main: we should have a merge here: $ hg debugindex --changelog rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 73 ..... 0 cdca01651b96 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 73 68 ..... 1 f6718a9cb7f3 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re) 2 141 68 ..... 2 bdd988058d16 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re) 3 209 66 ..... 3 d8a521142a3c f6718a9cb7f3 bdd988058d16 (re) log should show foo and quux changed: $ hg log -v -r tip changeset: 3:d8a521142a3c tag: tip parent: 1:f6718a9cb7f3 parent: 2:bdd988058d16 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: foo quux description: merge foo: we should have a merge here: $ hg debugindex foo rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) 2 7 4 ..... 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) 3 11 4 ..... 3 aa27919ee430 2ffeddde1b65 33d1fb69067a (re) bar: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) baz: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex baz rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 4 ..... 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) quux: we should not have a merge here: $ hg debugindex quux rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 3 ..... 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re) 1 3 5 ..... 3 6128c0f33108 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re) Manifest entries should match tips of all files: $ hg manifest --debug 33d1fb69067a0139622a3fa3b7ba1cdb1367972e 644 bar 2ffeddde1b65b4827f6746174a145474129fa2ce 644 baz aa27919ee4303cfd575e1fb932dd64d75aa08be4 644 foo 6128c0f33108e8cfbb4e0824d13ae48b466d7280 644 quux Everything should be clean now: $ hg status $ hg verify checking changesets checking manifests crosschecking files in changesets and manifests checking files 4 files, 4 changesets, 10 total revisions $ cd ..