view tests/test-filebranch.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 7e9cbb9c6053
children 2428e8ec0793
line wrap: on
line source

This test makes sure that we don't mark a file as merged with its ancestor
when we do a merge.

  $ cat <<EOF > merge
  > import sys, os
  > print "merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1])
  > EOF
  $ HGMERGE="python ../merge"; export HGMERGE

Creating base:

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo 1 > foo
  $ echo 1 > bar
  $ echo 1 > baz
  $ echo 1 > quux
  $ hg add foo bar baz quux
  $ hg commit -m "base"

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone a b
  updating to branch default
  4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Creating branch a:

  $ cd a
  $ echo 2a > foo
  $ echo 2a > bar
  $ hg commit -m "branch a"

Creating branch b:

  $ cd ..
  $ cd b
  $ echo 2b > foo
  $ echo 2b > baz
  $ hg commit -m "branch b"

We shouldn't have anything but n state here:

  $ hg debugstate --nodates | grep -v "^n"
  [1]

Merging:

  $ hg pull ../a
  pulling from ../a
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg merge -v
  resolving manifests
  getting bar
  merging foo
  merging for foo
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ echo 2m > foo
  $ echo 2b > baz
  $ echo new > quux

  $ hg ci -m "merge"

main: we should have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex --changelog
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0      73  .....       0 cdca01651b96 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1        73      68  .....       1 f6718a9cb7f3 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re)
       2       141      68  .....       2 bdd988058d16 cdca01651b96 000000000000 (re)
       3       209      66  .....       3 d8a521142a3c f6718a9cb7f3 bdd988058d16 (re)

log should show foo and quux changed:

  $ hg log -v -r tip
  changeset:   3:d8a521142a3c
  tag:         tip
  parent:      1:f6718a9cb7f3
  parent:      2:bdd988058d16
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       foo quux
  description:
  merge
  
  

foo: we should have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       3  .....       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         3       4  .....       1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re)
       2         7       4  .....       2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re)
       3        11       4  .....       3 aa27919ee430 2ffeddde1b65 33d1fb69067a (re)

bar: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       3  .....       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         3       4  .....       2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re)

baz: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex baz
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       3  .....       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         3       4  .....       1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re)

quux: we should not have a merge here:

  $ hg debugindex quux
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       3  .....       0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         3       5  .....       3 6128c0f33108 b8e02f643373 000000000000 (re)

Manifest entries should match tips of all files:

  $ hg manifest --debug
  33d1fb69067a0139622a3fa3b7ba1cdb1367972e 644   bar
  2ffeddde1b65b4827f6746174a145474129fa2ce 644   baz
  aa27919ee4303cfd575e1fb932dd64d75aa08be4 644   foo
  6128c0f33108e8cfbb4e0824d13ae48b466d7280 644   quux

Everything should be clean now:

  $ hg status

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  4 files, 4 changesets, 10 total revisions

  $ cd ..