view tests/test-merge-commit.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 564a354f7f35
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

Check that renames are correctly saved by a commit after a merge

Test with the merge on 3 having the rename on the local parent

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a

  $ echo line1 > foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ hg ci -m '0: add foo'

  $ echo line2 >> foo
  $ hg ci -m '1: change foo'

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg mv foo bar
  $ rm bar
  $ echo line0 > bar
  $ echo line1 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m '2: mv foo bar; change bar'
  created new head

  $ hg merge 1
  merging bar and foo to bar
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat bar
  line0
  line1
  line2

  $ hg ci -m '3: merge with local rename'

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0      77  .....       2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1        77      76  .....       3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re)

  $ hg debugrename bar
  bar renamed from foo:9e25c27b87571a1edee5ae4dddee5687746cc8e2

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       7  .....       0 690b295714ae 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         7      13  .....       1 9e25c27b8757 690b295714ae 000000000000 (re)


Revert the content change from rev 2:

  $ hg up -C 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm bar
  $ echo line1 > bar
  $ hg ci -m '4: revert content change from rev 2'
  created new head

  $ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {parents}\n'
  4:2263c1be0967 2:0f2ff26688b9 
  3:0555950ead28 2:0f2ff26688b9 1:5cd961e4045d 
  2:0f2ff26688b9 0:2665aaee66e9 
  1:5cd961e4045d 
  0:2665aaee66e9 

This should use bar@rev2 as the ancestor:

  $ hg --debug merge 3
    searching for copies back to rev 1
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: 0f2ff26688b9, local: 2263c1be0967+, remote: 0555950ead28
   preserving bar for resolve of bar
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging bar
  my bar@2263c1be0967+ other bar@0555950ead28 ancestor bar@0f2ff26688b9
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat bar
  line1
  line2

  $ hg ci -m '5: merge'

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0      77  .....       2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1        77      76  .....       3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re)
       2       153       7  .....       4 ff4b45017382 d35118874825 000000000000 (re)
       3       160      13  .....       5 3701b4893544 ff4b45017382 5345f5ab8abd (re)


Same thing, but with the merge on 3 having the rename
on the remote parent:

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone -U -r 1 -r 2 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
  $ cd b

  $ hg up -C 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge 2
  merging foo and bar to bar
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat bar
  line0
  line1
  line2

  $ hg ci -m '3: merge with remote rename'

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0      77  .....       2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1        77      76  .....       3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re)

  $ hg debugrename bar
  bar renamed from foo:9e25c27b87571a1edee5ae4dddee5687746cc8e2

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       7  .....       0 690b295714ae 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         7      13  .....       1 9e25c27b8757 690b295714ae 000000000000 (re)


Revert the content change from rev 2:

  $ hg up -C 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ rm bar
  $ echo line1 > bar
  $ hg ci -m '4: revert content change from rev 2'
  created new head

  $ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {parents}\n'
  4:2263c1be0967 2:0f2ff26688b9 
  3:3ffa6b9e35f0 1:5cd961e4045d 2:0f2ff26688b9 
  2:0f2ff26688b9 0:2665aaee66e9 
  1:5cd961e4045d 
  0:2665aaee66e9 

This should use bar@rev2 as the ancestor:

  $ hg --debug merge 3
    searching for copies back to rev 1
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: 0f2ff26688b9, local: 2263c1be0967+, remote: 3ffa6b9e35f0
   preserving bar for resolve of bar
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging bar
  my bar@2263c1be0967+ other bar@3ffa6b9e35f0 ancestor bar@0f2ff26688b9
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ cat bar
  line1
  line2

  $ hg ci -m '5: merge'

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0      77  .....       2 d35118874825 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1        77      76  .....       3 5345f5ab8abd 000000000000 d35118874825 (re)
       2       153       7  .....       4 ff4b45017382 d35118874825 000000000000 (re)
       3       160      13  .....       5 3701b4893544 ff4b45017382 5345f5ab8abd (re)

  $ cd ..