Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-mq-merge.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965
zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0
As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.
This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.
The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.
The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.
In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800 |
parents | e955549cd045 |
children | 4441705b7111 |
line wrap: on
line source
Setup extension: $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH > [extensions] > mq = > [mq] > git = keep > EOF Test merge with mq changeset as the second parent: $ hg init m $ cd m $ touch a b c $ hg add a $ hg commit -m a $ hg add b $ hg qnew -d "0 0" b $ hg update 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg add c $ hg commit -m c created new head $ hg merge 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg commit -m merge abort: cannot commit over an applied mq patch [255] $ cd .. Issue529: mq aborts when merging patch deleting files $ checkundo() > { > if [ -f .hg/store/undo ]; then > echo ".hg/store/undo still exists" > fi > } Commit two dummy files in "init" changeset: $ hg init t $ cd t $ echo a > a $ echo b > b $ hg ci -Am init adding a adding b $ hg tag -l init Create a patch removing a: $ hg qnew rm_a $ hg rm a $ hg qrefresh -m "rm a" Save the patch queue so we can merge it later: $ hg qsave -c -e copy $TESTTMP/t/.hg/patches to $TESTTMP/t/.hg/patches.1 (glob) $ checkundo Update b and commit in an "update" changeset: $ hg up -C init 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo b >> b $ hg st M b $ hg ci -m update created new head # Here, qpush used to abort with : # The system cannot find the file specified => a $ hg manifest a b $ hg qpush -a -m merging with queue at: $TESTTMP/t/.hg/patches.1 (glob) applying rm_a now at: rm_a $ checkundo $ hg manifest b Ensure status is correct after merge: $ hg qpop -a popping rm_a popping .hg.patches.merge.marker patch queue now empty $ cd .. Classic MQ merge sequence *with an explicit named queue*: $ hg init t2 $ cd t2 $ echo '[diff]' > .hg/hgrc $ echo 'nodates = 1' >> .hg/hgrc $ echo a > a $ hg ci -Am init adding a $ echo b > a $ hg ci -m changea $ hg up -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg cp a aa $ echo c >> a $ hg qnew --git -f -e patcha $ echo d >> a $ hg qnew -d '0 0' -f -e patcha2 Create the reference queue: $ hg qsave -c -e -n refqueue copy $TESTTMP/t2/.hg/patches to $TESTTMP/t2/.hg/refqueue (glob) $ hg up -C 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved Merge: $ HGMERGE=internal:other hg qpush -a -m -n refqueue merging with queue at: $TESTTMP/t2/.hg/refqueue (glob) applying patcha patching file a Hunk #1 succeeded at 2 with fuzz 1 (offset 0 lines). fuzz found when applying patch, stopping patch didn't work out, merging patcha 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved 0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) applying patcha2 now at: patcha2 Check patcha is still a git patch: $ cat .hg/patches/patcha # HG changeset patch # Parent d3873e73d99ef67873dac33fbcc66268d5d2b6f4 diff --git a/a b/a --- a/a +++ b/a @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ -b +a +c diff --git a/a b/aa copy from a copy to aa --- a/a +++ b/aa @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -b +a Check patcha2 is still a regular patch: $ cat .hg/patches/patcha2 # HG changeset patch # Date 0 0 # Parent ???????????????????????????????????????? (glob) diff -r ???????????? -r ???????????? a (glob) --- a/a +++ b/a @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ a c +d $ cd ..