view tests/test-rename-dir-merge.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t

  $ mkdir a
  $ echo foo > a/a
  $ echo bar > a/b
  $ hg ci -Am "0"
  adding a/a
  adding a/b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg mv a b
  moving a/a to b/a (glob)
  moving a/b to b/b (glob)
  $ hg ci -m "1 mv a/ b/"

  $ hg co -C 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo baz > a/c
  $ echo quux > a/d
  $ hg add a/c
  $ hg ci -m "2 add a/c"
  created new head

  $ hg merge --debug 1
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     a/c
    unmatched files in other:
     b/a
     b/b
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'a/a' -> dst: 'b/a' 
     src: 'a/b' -> dst: 'b/b' 
    checking for directory renames
     discovered dir src: 'a/' -> dst: 'b/'
     pending file src: 'a/c' -> dst: 'b/c'
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: f9b20c0d4c51, local: ce36d17b18fb+, remote: 397f8b00a740
   a/a: other deleted -> r
  removing a/a
   a/b: other deleted -> r
  removing a/b
   b/a: remote created -> g
  getting b/a
   b/b: remote created -> g
  getting b/b
   b/c: remote directory rename - move from a/c -> dm
  moving a/c to b/c (glob)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ echo a/* b/*
  a/d b/a b/b b/c
  $ hg st -C
  M b/a
  M b/b
  A b/c
    a/c
  R a/a
  R a/b
  R a/c
  ? a/d
  $ hg ci -m "3 merge 2+1"
  $ hg debugrename b/c
  b/c renamed from a/c:354ae8da6e890359ef49ade27b68bbc361f3ca88 (glob)

  $ hg co -C 1
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge --debug 2
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     b/a
     b/b
    unmatched files in other:
     a/c
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'a/a' -> dst: 'b/a' 
     src: 'a/b' -> dst: 'b/b' 
    checking for directory renames
     discovered dir src: 'a/' -> dst: 'b/'
     pending file src: 'a/c' -> dst: 'b/c'
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: f9b20c0d4c51, local: 397f8b00a740+, remote: ce36d17b18fb
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   b/c: local directory rename - get from a/c -> dg
  getting a/c to b/c
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ echo a/* b/*
  a/d b/a b/b b/c
  $ hg st -C
  A b/c
    a/c
  ? a/d
  $ hg ci -m "4 merge 1+2"
  created new head
  $ hg debugrename b/c
  b/c renamed from a/c:354ae8da6e890359ef49ade27b68bbc361f3ca88 (glob)

Local directory rename with conflicting file added in remote source directory
and untracked in local target directory.

  $ hg co -qC 1
  $ echo target > b/c
  $ hg merge 2
  b/c: untracked file differs
  abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
  [255]
  $ cat b/c
  target
but it should succeed if the content matches
  $ hg cat -r 2 a/c > b/c
  $ hg merge 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg st -C
  A b/c
    a/c
  ? a/d

Local directory rename with conflicting file added in remote source directory
and committed in local target directory.

  $ hg co -qC 1
  $ echo target > b/c
  $ hg add b/c
  $ hg commit -qm 'new file in target directory'
  $ hg merge 2
  merging b/c and a/c to b/c
  warning: conflicts while merging b/c! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
  [1]
  $ hg st -A
  M b/c
    a/c
  ? a/d
  ? b/c.orig
  C b/a
  C b/b
  $ cat b/c
  <<<<<<< working copy: f1c50ca4f127 - test: new file in target directory
  target
  =======
  baz
  >>>>>>> merge rev:    ce36d17b18fb  - test: 2 add a/c
  $ rm b/c.orig

Remote directory rename with conflicting file added in remote target directory
and committed in local source directory.

  $ hg co -qC 2
  $ hg st -A
  ? a/d
  C a/a
  C a/b
  C a/c
  $ hg merge 5
  merging a/c and b/c to b/c
  warning: conflicts while merging b/c! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
  [1]
  $ hg st -A
  M b/a
  M b/b
  M b/c
    a/c
  R a/a
  R a/b
  R a/c
  ? a/d
  ? b/c.orig
  $ cat b/c
  <<<<<<< working copy: ce36d17b18fb  - test: 2 add a/c
  baz
  =======
  target
  >>>>>>> merge rev:    f1c50ca4f127 - test: new file in target directory

Second scenario with two repos:

  $ cd ..
  $ hg init r1
  $ cd r1
  $ mkdir a
  $ echo foo > a/f
  $ hg add a
  adding a/f (glob)
  $ hg ci -m "a/f == foo"
  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone r1 r2
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd r2
  $ hg mv a b
  moving a/f to b/f (glob)
  $ echo foo1 > b/f
  $ hg ci -m" a -> b, b/f == foo1"
  $ cd ..

  $ cd r1
  $ mkdir a/aa
  $ echo bar > a/aa/g
  $ hg add a/aa
  adding a/aa/g (glob)
  $ hg ci -m "a/aa/g"
  $ hg pull ../r2
  pulling from ../r2
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)

  $ hg merge
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg st -C
  M b/f
  A b/aa/g
    a/aa/g
  R a/aa/g
  R a/f

  $ cd ..

Test renames to separate directories

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ mkdir a
  $ touch a/s
  $ touch a/t
  $ hg ci -Am0
  adding a/s
  adding a/t

Add more files

  $ touch a/s2
  $ touch a/t2
  $ hg ci -Am1
  adding a/s2
  adding a/t2

Do moves on a branch

  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkdir s
  $ mkdir t
  $ hg mv a/s s
  $ hg mv a/t t
  $ hg ci -Am2
  created new head
  $ hg st --copies --change .
  A s/s
    a/s
  A t/t
    a/t
  R a/s
  R a/t

Merge shouldn't move s2, t2

  $ hg merge
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg st --copies
  M a/s2
  M a/t2

Try the merge in the other direction. It may or may not be appropriate for
status to list copies here.

  $ hg up -C 1
  4 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg st --copies
  M s/s
  M t/t
  R a/s
  R a/t