view tests/test-repair-strip.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 769aee32fae0
children 75be14993fda
line wrap: on
line source

#require unix-permissions no-root

  $ cat > $TESTTMP/dumpjournal.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > for entry in sys.stdin.read().split('\n'):
  >     if entry:
  >         print entry.split('\x00')[0]
  > EOF

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "mq=">> $HGRCPATH

  $ teststrip() {
  >   hg -q up -C $1
  >   echo % before update $1, strip $2
  >   hg parents
  >   chmod -$3 $4
  >   hg strip $2 2>&1 | sed 's/\(bundle\).*/\1/' | sed 's/Permission denied.*\.hg\/store\/\(.*\)/Permission denied \.hg\/store\/\1/'
  >   echo % after update $1, strip $2
  >   chmod +$3 $4
  >   hg verify
  >   echo % journal contents
  >   if [ -f .hg/store/journal ]; then
  >       cat .hg/store/journal | python $TESTTMP/dumpjournal.py
  >   else
  >       echo "(no journal)"
  >   fi
  >   ls .hg/store/journal >/dev/null 2>&1 && hg recover
  >   ls .hg/strip-backup/* >/dev/null 2>&1 && hg unbundle -q .hg/strip-backup/*
  >   rm -rf .hg/strip-backup
  > }

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg -q ci -m "a" -A
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg -q ci -m "b" -A
  $ echo b2 >> b
  $ hg -q ci -m "b2" -A
  $ echo c > c
  $ hg -q ci -m "c" -A
  $ teststrip 0 2 w .hg/store/data/b.i
  % before update 0, strip 2
  changeset:   0:cb9a9f314b8b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     a
  
  saved backup bundle
  transaction abort!
  failed to truncate data/b.i
  rollback failed - please run hg recover
  strip failed, backup bundle
  abort: Permission denied .hg/store/data/b.i
  % after update 0, strip 2
  abandoned transaction found - run hg recover
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
   b@?: rev 1 points to nonexistent changeset 2
   (expected 1)
   b@?: 736c29771fba not in manifests
  warning: orphan revlog 'data/c.i'
  2 files, 2 changesets, 3 total revisions
  2 warnings encountered!
  2 integrity errors encountered!
  % journal contents
  00changelog.i
  00manifest.i
  data/b.i
  data/c.i
  rolling back interrupted transaction
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  2 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions
  $ teststrip 0 2 r .hg/store/data/b.i
  % before update 0, strip 2
  changeset:   0:cb9a9f314b8b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     a
  
  abort: Permission denied .hg/store/data/b.i
  % after update 0, strip 2
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  3 files, 4 changesets, 4 total revisions
  % journal contents
  (no journal)
  $ teststrip 0 2 w .hg/store/00manifest.i
  % before update 0, strip 2
  changeset:   0:cb9a9f314b8b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     a
  
  saved backup bundle
  transaction abort!
  failed to truncate 00manifest.i
  rollback failed - please run hg recover
  strip failed, backup bundle
  abort: Permission denied .hg/store/00manifest.i
  % after update 0, strip 2
  abandoned transaction found - run hg recover
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
   manifest@?: rev 2 points to nonexistent changeset 2
   manifest@?: 3362547cdf64 not in changesets
   manifest@?: rev 3 points to nonexistent changeset 3
   manifest@?: 265a85892ecb not in changesets
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
   c@3: in manifest but not in changeset
  checking files
   b@?: rev 1 points to nonexistent changeset 2
   (expected 1)
   c@?: rev 0 points to nonexistent changeset 3
  3 files, 2 changesets, 4 total revisions
  1 warnings encountered!
  7 integrity errors encountered!
  (first damaged changeset appears to be 3)
  % journal contents
  00changelog.i
  00manifest.i
  data/b.i
  data/c.i
  rolling back interrupted transaction
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  2 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions

  $ cd ..