view tests/test-static-http.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 34a5f6c66bc5
children 728d37353e1e
line wrap: on
line source

#require killdaemons

  $ hg clone http://localhost:$HGPORT/ copy
  abort: * (glob)
  [255]
  $ test -d copy
  [1]

This server doesn't do range requests so it's basically only good for
one pull

  $ python "$TESTDIR/dumbhttp.py" -p $HGPORT --pid dumb.pid
  $ cat dumb.pid >> $DAEMON_PIDS
  $ hg init remote
  $ cd remote
  $ echo foo > bar
  $ echo c2 > '.dotfile with spaces'
  $ hg add
  adding .dotfile with spaces
  adding bar
  $ hg commit -m"test"
  $ hg tip
  changeset:   0:02770d679fb8
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     test
  
  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote local
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd local
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  2 files, 1 changesets, 2 total revisions
  $ cat bar
  foo
  $ cd ../remote
  $ echo baz > quux
  $ hg commit -A -mtest2
  adding quux

check for HTTP opener failures when cachefile does not exist

  $ rm .hg/cache/*
  $ cd ../local
  $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [hooks]
  > changegroup = sh -c "printenv.py changegroup"
  > EOF
  $ hg pull
  pulling from static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  changegroup hook: HG_NODE=4ac2e3648604439c580c69b09ec9d93a88d93432 HG_NODE_LAST=4ac2e3648604439c580c69b09ec9d93a88d93432 HG_SOURCE=pull HG_TXNID=TXN:* HG_URL=http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote (glob)
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)

trying to push

  $ hg update
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo more foo >> bar
  $ hg commit -m"test"
  $ hg push
  pushing to static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote
  abort: destination does not support push
  [255]

trying clone -r

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone -r doesnotexist static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote local0
  abort: unknown revision 'doesnotexist'!
  [255]
  $ hg clone -r 0 static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remote local0
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

test with "/" URI (issue747) and subrepo

  $ hg init
  $ hg init sub
  $ touch sub/test
  $ hg -R sub commit -A -m "test"
  adding test
  $ hg -R sub tag not-empty
  $ echo sub=sub > .hgsub
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a .hgsub
  $ hg -q ci -ma
  $ hg clone static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/ local2
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 3 changes to 3 files
  updating to branch default
  cloning subrepo sub from static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/sub
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd local2
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  3 files, 1 changesets, 3 total revisions
  checking subrepo links
  $ cat a
  a
  $ hg paths
  default = static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/

test with empty repo (issue965)

  $ cd ..
  $ hg init remotempty
  $ hg clone static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remotempty local3
  no changes found
  updating to branch default
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd local3
  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  0 files, 0 changesets, 0 total revisions
  $ hg paths
  default = static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/remotempty

test with non-repo

  $ cd ..
  $ mkdir notarepo
  $ hg clone static-http://localhost:$HGPORT/notarepo local3
  abort: 'http://localhost:$HGPORT/notarepo' does not appear to be an hg repository!
  [255]
  $ killdaemons.py