view tests/test-status.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0

As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish
for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that
happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And
that requires bindings.

This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we
need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says,
relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present
is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with
Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will
work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by
achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another
reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the
API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target
multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle
an explicit, known working version.

The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface
to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming,
reading and writing from objects implements the file object
protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression
parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6,
2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are
CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension.
Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy.
But it will be possible.

The files added in this commit come from Git commit
e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from
https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without
modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been
omitted, namely files related to continuous integration.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the
"python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code
added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have
not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested
much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs),
there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well
thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and
send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly
appreciated.

Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code
style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces
numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code
is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with.
These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ mkdir a b a/1 b/1 b/2
  $ touch in_root a/in_a b/in_b a/1/in_a_1 b/1/in_b_1 b/2/in_b_2

hg status in repo root:

  $ hg status
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root

hg status . in repo root:

  $ hg status .
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root

  $ hg status --cwd a
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd a .
  ? 1/in_a_1
  ? in_a
  $ hg status --cwd a ..
  ? 1/in_a_1
  ? in_a
  ? ../b/1/in_b_1
  ? ../b/2/in_b_2
  ? ../b/in_b
  ? ../in_root

  $ hg status --cwd b
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b .
  ? 1/in_b_1
  ? 2/in_b_2
  ? in_b
  $ hg status --cwd b ..
  ? ../a/1/in_a_1
  ? ../a/in_a
  ? 1/in_b_1
  ? 2/in_b_2
  ? in_b
  ? ../in_root

  $ hg status --cwd a/1
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd a/1 .
  ? in_a_1
  $ hg status --cwd a/1 ..
  ? in_a_1
  ? ../in_a

  $ hg status --cwd b/1
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b/1 .
  ? in_b_1
  $ hg status --cwd b/1 ..
  ? in_b_1
  ? ../2/in_b_2
  ? ../in_b

  $ hg status --cwd b/2
  ? a/1/in_a_1
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/1/in_b_1
  ? b/2/in_b_2
  ? b/in_b
  ? in_root
  $ hg status --cwd b/2 .
  ? in_b_2
  $ hg status --cwd b/2 ..
  ? ../1/in_b_1
  ? in_b_2
  ? ../in_b

combining patterns with root and patterns without a root works

  $ hg st a/in_a re:.*b$
  ? a/in_a
  ? b/in_b

  $ cd ..

  $ hg init repo2
  $ cd repo2
  $ touch modified removed deleted ignored
  $ echo "^ignored$" > .hgignore
  $ hg ci -A -m 'initial checkin'
  adding .hgignore
  adding deleted
  adding modified
  adding removed
  $ touch modified added unknown ignored
  $ hg add added
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted

hg status:

  $ hg status
  A added
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

hg status modified added removed deleted unknown never-existed ignored:

  $ hg status modified added removed deleted unknown never-existed ignored
  never-existed: * (glob)
  A added
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

  $ hg copy modified copied

hg status -C:

  $ hg status -C
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

hg status -A:

  $ hg status -A
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown
  I ignored
  C .hgignore
  C modified

  $ hg status -A -Tjson
  [
   {
    "path": "added",
    "status": "A"
   },
   {
    "copy": "modified",
    "path": "copied",
    "status": "A"
   },
   {
    "path": "removed",
    "status": "R"
   },
   {
    "path": "deleted",
    "status": "!"
   },
   {
    "path": "unknown",
    "status": "?"
   },
   {
    "path": "ignored",
    "status": "I"
   },
   {
    "path": ".hgignore",
    "status": "C"
   },
   {
    "path": "modified",
    "status": "C"
   }
  ]

  $ hg status -A -Tpickle > pickle
  >>> from __future__ import print_function
  >>> import pickle
  >>> print(sorted((x['status'], x['path']) for x in pickle.load(open("pickle"))))
  [('!', 'deleted'), ('?', 'pickle'), ('?', 'unknown'), ('A', 'added'), ('A', 'copied'), ('C', '.hgignore'), ('C', 'modified'), ('I', 'ignored'), ('R', 'removed')]
  $ rm pickle

  $ echo "^ignoreddir$" > .hgignore
  $ mkdir ignoreddir
  $ touch ignoreddir/file

Test templater support:

  $ hg status -AT "[{status}]\t{if(copy, '{copy} -> ')}{path}\n"
  [M]	.hgignore
  [A]	added
  [A]	modified -> copied
  [R]	removed
  [!]	deleted
  [?]	ignored
  [?]	unknown
  [I]	ignoreddir/file
  [C]	modified
  $ hg status -AT default
  M .hgignore
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? ignored
  ? unknown
  I ignoreddir/file
  C modified
  $ hg status -T compact
  abort: "status" not in template map
  [255]

hg status ignoreddir/file:

  $ hg status ignoreddir/file

hg status -i ignoreddir/file:

  $ hg status -i ignoreddir/file
  I ignoreddir/file
  $ cd ..

Check 'status -q' and some combinations

  $ hg init repo3
  $ cd repo3
  $ touch modified removed deleted ignored
  $ echo "^ignored$" > .hgignore
  $ hg commit -A -m 'initial checkin'
  adding .hgignore
  adding deleted
  adding modified
  adding removed
  $ touch added unknown ignored
  $ hg add added
  $ echo "test" >> modified
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted
  $ hg copy modified copied

Specify working directory revision explicitly, that should be the same as
"hg status"

  $ hg status --change "wdir()"
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
  R removed
  ! deleted
  ? unknown

Run status with 2 different flags.
Check if result is the same or different.
If result is not as expected, raise error

  $ assert() {
  >     hg status $1 > ../a
  >     hg status $2 > ../b
  >     if diff ../a ../b > /dev/null; then
  >         out=0
  >     else
  >         out=1
  >     fi
  >     if [ $3 -eq 0 ]; then
  >         df="same"
  >     else
  >         df="different"
  >     fi
  >     if [ $out -ne $3 ]; then
  >         echo "Error on $1 and $2, should be $df."
  >     fi
  > }

Assert flag1 flag2 [0-same | 1-different]

  $ assert "-q" "-mard"      0
  $ assert "-A" "-marduicC"  0
  $ assert "-qA" "-mardcC"   0
  $ assert "-qAui" "-A"      0
  $ assert "-qAu" "-marducC" 0
  $ assert "-qAi" "-mardicC" 0
  $ assert "-qu" "-u"        0
  $ assert "-q" "-u"         1
  $ assert "-m" "-a"         1
  $ assert "-r" "-d"         1
  $ cd ..

  $ hg init repo4
  $ cd repo4
  $ touch modified removed deleted
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'initial checkin'
  $ touch added unknown
  $ hg add added
  $ hg remove removed
  $ rm deleted
  $ echo x > modified
  $ hg copy modified copied
  $ hg ci -m 'test checkin' -d "1000001 0"
  $ rm *
  $ touch unrelated
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'unrelated checkin' -d "1000002 0"

hg status --change 1:

  $ hg status --change 1
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
  R removed

hg status --change 1 unrelated:

  $ hg status --change 1 unrelated

hg status -C --change 1 added modified copied removed deleted:

  $ hg status -C --change 1 added modified copied removed deleted
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed

hg status -A --change 1 and revset:

  $ hg status -A --change '1|1'
  M modified
  A added
  A copied
    modified
  R removed
  C deleted

  $ cd ..

hg status with --rev and reverted changes:

  $ hg init reverted-changes-repo
  $ cd reverted-changes-repo
  $ echo a > file
  $ hg add file
  $ hg ci -m a
  $ echo b > file
  $ hg ci -m b

reverted file should appear clean

  $ hg revert -r 0 .
  reverting file
  $ hg status -A --rev 0
  C file

#if execbit
reverted file with changed flag should appear modified

  $ chmod +x file
  $ hg status -A --rev 0
  M file

  $ hg revert -r 0 .
  reverting file

reverted and committed file with changed flag should appear modified

  $ hg co -C .
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ chmod +x file
  $ hg ci -m 'change flag'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 --rev 2
  M file
  $ hg diff -r 1 -r 2

#endif

hg status of binary file starting with '\1\n', a separator for metadata:

  $ hg init repo5
  $ cd repo5
  >>> open("010a", "wb").write("\1\nfoo")
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'initial checkin'
  $ hg status -A
  C 010a

  >>> open("010a", "wb").write("\1\nbar")
  $ hg status -A
  M 010a
  $ hg ci -q -m 'modify 010a'
  $ hg status -A --rev 0:1
  M 010a

  $ touch empty
  $ hg ci -q -A -m 'add another file'
  $ hg status -A --rev 1:2 010a
  C 010a

  $ cd ..

test "hg status" with "directory pattern" which matches against files
only known on target revision.

  $ hg init repo6
  $ cd repo6

  $ echo a > a.txt
  $ hg add a.txt
  $ hg commit -m '#0'
  $ mkdir -p 1/2/3/4/5
  $ echo b > 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg add 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg commit -m '#1'

  $ hg update -C 0 > /dev/null
  $ hg status -A
  C a.txt

the directory matching against specified pattern should be removed,
because directory existence prevents 'dirstate.walk()' from showing
warning message about such pattern.

  $ test ! -d 1
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3/4/5
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1/2/3
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt
  $ hg status -A --rev 1 1
  R 1/2/3/4/5/b.txt

  $ hg status --config ui.formatdebug=True --rev 1 1
  status = [
      {*'path': '1/2/3/4/5/b.txt'*}, (glob)
  ]

#if windows
  $ hg --config ui.slash=false status -A --rev 1 1
  R 1\2\3\4\5\b.txt
#endif

  $ cd ..

Status after move overwriting a file (issue4458)
=================================================


  $ hg init issue4458
  $ cd issue4458
  $ echo a > a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg commit -Am base
  adding a
  adding b


with --force

  $ hg mv b --force a
  $ hg st --copies
  M a
    b
  R b
  $ hg revert --all
  reverting a
  undeleting b
  $ rm *.orig

without force

  $ hg rm a
  $ hg st --copies
  R a
  $ hg mv b a
  $ hg st --copies
  M a
    b
  R b

using ui.statuscopies setting
  $ hg st --config ui.statuscopies=true
  M a
    b
  R b
  $ hg st --config ui.statuscopies=false
  M a
  R b

using log status template (issue5155)
  $ hg log -Tstatus -r 'wdir()' -C
  changeset:   2147483647:ffffffffffff
  parent:      0:8c55c58b4c0e
  user:        test
  date:        * (glob)
  files:
  M a
    b
  R b
  

Other "bug" highlight, the revision status does not report the copy information.
This is buggy behavior.

  $ hg commit -m 'blah'
  $ hg st --copies --change .
  M a
  R b

using log status template, the copy information is displayed correctly.
  $ hg log -Tstatus -r. -C
  changeset:   1:6685fde43d21
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        * (glob)
  summary:     blah
  files:
  M a
    b
  R b
  

  $ cd ..