view tests/test-update-branches.t @ 30435:b86a448a2965

zstd: vendor python-zstandard 0.5.0 As the commit message for the previous changeset says, we wish for zstd to be a 1st class citizen in Mercurial. To make that happen, we need to enable Python to talk to the zstd C API. And that requires bindings. This commit vendors a copy of existing Python bindings. Why do we need to vendor? As the commit message of the previous commit says, relying on systems in the wild to have the bindings or zstd present is a losing proposition. By distributing the zstd and bindings with Mercurial, we significantly increase our chances that zstd will work. Since zstd will deliver a better end-user experience by achieving better performance, this benefits our users. Another reason is that the Python bindings still aren't stable and the API is somewhat fluid. While Mercurial could be coded to target multiple versions of the Python bindings, it is safer to bundle an explicit, known working version. The added Python bindings are mostly a fully-featured interface to the zstd C API. They allow one-shot operations, streaming, reading and writing from objects implements the file object protocol, dictionary compression, control over low-level compression parameters, and more. The Python bindings work on Python 2.6, 2.7, and 3.3+ and have been tested on Linux and Windows. There are CFFI bindings, but they are lacking compared to the C extension. Upstream work will be needed before we can support zstd with PyPy. But it will be possible. The files added in this commit come from Git commit e637c1b214d5f869cf8116c550dcae23ec13b677 from https://github.com/indygreg/python-zstandard and are added without modifications. Some files from the upstream repository have been omitted, namely files related to continuous integration. In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm the maintainer of the "python-zstandard" project and have authored 100% of the code added in this commit. Unfortunately, the Python bindings have not been formally code reviewed by anyone. While I've tested much of the code thoroughly (I even have tests that fuzz APIs), there's a good chance there are bugs, memory leaks, not well thought out APIs, etc. If someone wants to review the code and send feedback to the GitHub project, it would be greatly appreciated. Despite my involvement with both projects, my opinions of code style differ from Mercurial's. The code in this commit introduces numerous code style violations in Mercurial's linters. So, the code is excluded from most lints. However, some violations I agree with. These have been added to the known violations ignore list for now.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:15:58 -0800
parents 40f845537dca
children 23eed7d423b4
line wrap: on
line source

# Construct the following history tree:
#
# @  5:e1bb631146ca  b1
# |
# o  4:a4fdb3b883c4 0:b608b9236435  b1
# |
# | o  3:4b57d2520816 1:44592833ba9f
# | |
# | | o  2:063f31070f65
# | |/
# | o  1:44592833ba9f
# |/
# o  0:b608b9236435

  $ mkdir b1
  $ cd b1
  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo zero > a
  $ hg init sub
  $ echo suba > sub/suba
  $ hg --cwd sub ci -Am addsuba
  adding suba
  $ echo 'sub = sub' > .hgsub
  $ hg ci -qAm0
  $ echo one > a ; hg ci -m1
  $ echo two > a ; hg ci -m2
  $ hg up -q 1
  $ echo three > a ; hg ci -qm3
  $ hg up -q 0
  $ hg branch -q b1
  $ echo four > a ; hg ci -qm4
  $ echo five > a ; hg ci -qm5

Initial repo state:

  $ hg log -G --template '{rev}:{node|short} {parents} {branches}\n'
  @  5:ff252e8273df  b1
  |
  o  4:d047485b3896 0:60829823a42a  b1
  |
  | o  3:6efa171f091b 1:0786582aa4b1
  | |
  | | o  2:bd10386d478c
  | |/
  | o  1:0786582aa4b1
  |/
  o  0:60829823a42a
  

Make sure update doesn't assume b1 is a repository if invoked from outside:

  $ cd ..
  $ hg update b1
  abort: no repository found in '$TESTTMP' (.hg not found)!
  [255]
  $ cd b1

Test helper functions:

  $ revtest () {
  >     msg=$1
  >     dirtyflag=$2   # 'clean', 'dirty' or 'dirtysub'
  >     startrev=$3
  >     targetrev=$4
  >     opt=$5
  >     hg up -qC $startrev
  >     test $dirtyflag = dirty && echo dirty > foo
  >     test $dirtyflag = dirtysub && echo dirty > sub/suba
  >     hg up $opt $targetrev
  >     hg parent --template 'parent={rev}\n'
  >     hg stat -S
  > }

  $ norevtest () {
  >     msg=$1
  >     dirtyflag=$2   # 'clean', 'dirty' or 'dirtysub'
  >     startrev=$3
  >     opt=$4
  >     hg up -qC $startrev
  >     test $dirtyflag = dirty && echo dirty > foo
  >     test $dirtyflag = dirtysub && echo dirty > sub/suba
  >     hg up $opt
  >     hg parent --template 'parent={rev}\n'
  >     hg stat -S
  > }

Test cases are documented in a table in the update function of merge.py.
Cases are run as shown in that table, row by row.

  $ norevtest 'none clean linear' clean 4
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=5

  $ norevtest 'none clean same'   clean 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  1 other heads for branch "default"
  parent=2


  $ revtest 'none clean linear' clean 1 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=2

  $ revtest 'none clean same'   clean 2 3
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=3

  $ revtest 'none clean cross'  clean 3 4
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=4


  $ revtest 'none dirty linear' dirty 1 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=2
  M foo

  $ revtest 'none dirtysub linear' dirtysub 1 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=2
  M sub/suba

  $ revtest 'none dirty same'   dirty 2 3
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  parent=2
  M foo

  $ revtest 'none dirtysub same'   dirtysub 2 3
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  parent=2
  M sub/suba

  $ revtest 'none dirty cross'  dirty 3 4
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  parent=3
  M foo

  $ norevtest 'none dirty cross'  dirty 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  1 other heads for branch "default"
  parent=2
  M foo

  $ revtest 'none dirtysub cross'  dirtysub 3 4
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  parent=3
  M sub/suba

  $ revtest '-C dirty linear'   dirty 1 2 -C
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=2

  $ revtest '-c dirty linear'   dirty 1 2 -c
  abort: uncommitted changes
  parent=1
  M foo

  $ revtest '-c dirtysub linear'   dirtysub 1 2 -c
  abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository 'sub'
  parent=1
  M sub/suba

  $ norevtest '-c clean same'   clean 2 -c
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  1 other heads for branch "default"
  parent=2

  $ revtest '-cC dirty linear'  dirty 1 2 -cC
  abort: cannot specify both -c/--check and -C/--clean
  parent=1
  M foo

  $ cd ..

Test updating with closed head
---------------------------------------------------------------------

  $ hg clone -U -q b1 closed-heads
  $ cd closed-heads

Test updating if at least one non-closed branch head exists

if on the closed branch head:
- update to "."
- "updated to a closed branch head ...." message is displayed
- "N other heads for ...." message is displayed

  $ hg update -q -C 3
  $ hg commit --close-branch -m 6
  $ norevtest "on closed branch head" clean 6
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  no open descendant heads on branch "default", updating to a closed head
  (committing will reopen the head, use 'hg heads .' to see 1 other heads)
  parent=6

if descendant non-closed branch head exists, and it is only one branch head:
- update to it, even if its revision is less than closed one
- "N other heads for ...." message isn't displayed

  $ norevtest "non-closed 2 should be chosen" clean 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=2

if all descendant branch heads are closed, but there is another branch head:
- update to the tipmost descendant head
- "updated to a closed branch head ...." message is displayed
- "N other heads for ...." message is displayed

  $ norevtest "all descendant branch heads are closed" clean 3
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  no open descendant heads on branch "default", updating to a closed head
  (committing will reopen the head, use 'hg heads .' to see 1 other heads)
  parent=6

Test updating if all branch heads are closed

if on the closed branch head:
- update to "."
- "updated to a closed branch head ...." message is displayed
- "all heads of branch ...." message is displayed

  $ hg update -q -C 2
  $ hg commit --close-branch -m 7
  $ norevtest "all heads of branch default are closed" clean 6
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  no open descendant heads on branch "default", updating to a closed head
  (committing will reopen branch "default")
  parent=6

if not on the closed branch head:
- update to the tipmost descendant (closed) head
- "updated to a closed branch head ...." message is displayed
- "all heads of branch ...." message is displayed

  $ norevtest "all heads of branch default are closed" clean 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  no open descendant heads on branch "default", updating to a closed head
  (committing will reopen branch "default")
  parent=7

  $ cd ..

Test updating if "default" branch doesn't exist and no revision is
checked out (= "default" is used as current branch)

  $ hg init no-default-branch
  $ cd no-default-branch

  $ hg branch foobar
  marked working directory as branch foobar
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -m "#0" -A
  adding a
  $ echo 1 >> a
  $ hg commit -m "#1"
  $ hg update -q 0
  $ echo 3 >> a
  $ hg commit -m "#2"
  created new head
  $ hg commit --close-branch -m "#3"

if there is at least one non-closed branch head:
- update to the tipmost branch head

  $ norevtest "non-closed 1 should be chosen" clean null
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  parent=1

if all branch heads are closed
- update to "tip"
- "updated to a closed branch head ...." message is displayed
- "all heads for branch "XXXX" are closed" message is displayed

  $ hg update -q -C 1
  $ hg commit --close-branch -m "#4"

  $ norevtest "all branches are closed" clean null
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  no open descendant heads on branch "foobar", updating to a closed head
  (committing will reopen branch "foobar")
  parent=4

  $ cd ../b1

Test obsolescence behavior
---------------------------------------------------------------------

successors should be taken in account when checking head destination

  $ cat << EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [ui]
  > logtemplate={rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}
  > [experimental]
  > evolution=createmarkers
  > EOF

Test no-argument update to a successor of an obsoleted changeset

  $ hg log -G
  o  5:ff252e8273df 5
  |
  o  4:d047485b3896 4
  |
  | o  3:6efa171f091b 3
  | |
  | | o  2:bd10386d478c 2
  | |/
  | @  1:0786582aa4b1 1
  |/
  o  0:60829823a42a 0
  
  $ hg book bm -r 3
  $ hg status
  M foo

We add simple obsolescence marker between 3 and 4 (indirect successors)

  $ hg id --debug -i -r 3
  6efa171f091b00a3c35edc15d48c52a498929953
  $ hg id --debug -i -r 4
  d047485b3896813b2a624e86201983520f003206
  $ hg debugobsolete 6efa171f091b00a3c35edc15d48c52a498929953 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
  $ hg debugobsolete aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa d047485b3896813b2a624e86201983520f003206

Test that 5 is detected as a valid destination from 3 and also accepts moving
the bookmark (issue4015)

  $ hg up --quiet --hidden 3
  $ hg up 5
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg book bm
  moving bookmark 'bm' forward from 6efa171f091b
  $ hg bookmarks
   * bm                        5:ff252e8273df

Test that 4 is detected as the no-argument destination from 3 and also moves
the bookmark with it
  $ hg up --quiet 0          # we should be able to update to 3 directly
  $ hg up --quiet --hidden 3 # but not implemented yet.
  $ hg book -f bm
  $ hg up
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updating bookmark bm
  $ hg book
   * bm                        4:d047485b3896

Test that 5 is detected as a valid destination from 1
  $ hg up --quiet 0          # we should be able to update to 3 directly
  $ hg up --quiet --hidden 3 # but not implemented yet.
  $ hg up 5
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Test that 5 is not detected as a valid destination from 2
  $ hg up --quiet 0
  $ hg up --quiet 2
  $ hg up 5
  abort: uncommitted changes
  (commit or update --clean to discard changes)
  [255]

Test that we don't crash when updating from a pruned changeset (i.e. has no
successors). Behavior should probably be that we update to the first
non-obsolete parent but that will be decided later.
  $ hg id --debug -r 2
  bd10386d478cd5a9faf2e604114c8e6da62d3889
  $ hg up --quiet 0
  $ hg up --quiet 2
  $ hg debugobsolete bd10386d478cd5a9faf2e604114c8e6da62d3889
  $ hg up
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Test experimental revset support

  $ hg log -r '_destupdate()'
  2:bd10386d478c 2 (no-eol)

Test that boolean flags allow --no-flag specification to override [defaults]
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [defaults]
  > update = --check
  > EOF
  $ hg co 2
  abort: uncommitted changes
  [255]
  $ hg co --no-check 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved